why wasn't there plane wreckage from united 93 that "crashed" on 9.11.01??

Question

ther also wasn't wreckage at the pentagon crash site. hhmmmmmmmmmm.......

even though this would have been a 500-600 mph crash with high velocity and impact there would be SOMETHING like every other plane crash ever. so what happened??

wow the venom from some of you answerers so far is astounding. did i mention somewhere i believe this happened or i hate the government?? not quite. i just wanted to see what people thought so don't get your conservative george bush loving panties in a wad people. leaving my question open but fvcking chill and don't assume and get so defensive. losers.

Answer 1

Don't know where you got that idea, but there WAS plane wreckage at both sites. There's a very famous picture of part of the rudder and tail section of the plane that crashed into the pentagon sitting in front of the building...and numerous shots of plane wreckage from the flight 93 site.
Many news outlets limited showing pictures of the wreckage out of respect for the families of the victims -- but there are plenty out there.

Answer 2

You're the victim of yet another internet myth. Wreckage was found and it's been analyzed quite a bit. The March 2005 Popular Mechanics article is pretty good on this.

the engine was found only 300 yards from the main crash site, and its location was consistent with the direction in which the plane had been traveling.31 Furthermore, the black box for the flight records the struggle onboard preceding the plane’s crash. Conspiracy theorists are left with not only an evidentially worthless theory,

Answer 3

lol It must have been one of those new pipe dream aircraft made out of wishful thinking and pipe dreams. All full of hot air. I think it was sponsered by the republicans and democrates. I remember NASA designed it to leave no traces upon impact. It was produces at area 51. The actually aircraft was built in the 1950s but due to cost overruns the congress had to wait till now to reveal the wooden aircraft. Because it would have cost far less if they had acknoledged it eariler. This due to kickbacks being cut off for all of congress. It was also reported that Haleburten recieved the clean up contract for the airplane. And was awarded a contract for 50 bizzilion. But the goverment is requesting 1 Bizzilion stating they did not recieve all they ask for in the contract. Haleburton spokesmen Mr. Ahwescrewsu when contacted said we clean it all up. But could find no record of the actually events. So the bottom line is this was a great question!!!

Answer 4

Here we go....

The speed of the aircraft was so great that the debris was scattered very widely. Remember, these were not military aircraft, they were civilian and not constructed as high performance jets. These planes are not made to travel at 580 knots at the altitude they were traveling in. And FYI...there was wreckage. It was small enough for the most part to be able to be picked up in one hand.


Jeebus! There was a secondary debris field! And the windows in the Pentagon are blast resistant...it IS the Pentagon after all.

As far as what happens to the debris after the crash, the NTSB collects everything and transports it to a warehouse where they attempt to reconstruct it to help analyze the cause of the crash. It is then boxed up and any pertinent pieces are retained while the remainder is usually sent to recycling.

Answer 5

You mean, apart from all the wreckage that was found at both sites? And, for the Pentagon crash, dozens of eyewitnesses and security camera footage?

Seriously, take 30 seconds to do a Google search.

Answer 6

There was lots of debris left from the crashes. If you look at most large plane crashes though at high impact they break apart over large areas of the impact site...not into one small grouping. Part of a tail here, 1/4 cockpit here, etc. The wreckage probably was in over a mile radius.

Think also about the Space Shuttle blowing up...it was spread out over a large space in thousands of miles.

Answer 7

is there a reason you think there wasn't plane wreckage????

The was wreckage, but going 500 - 600 mph tend not to leave many big pieces.

Answer 8

1. if there was no wreckage, then what crashed into the pentagon (note: a bomb from the interior would have caused the wreckage to explode outward, not inward)
2. there was wreckage of flight 93, I saw it on CNN sitting in the middle of the field in Pennsylvania

Answer 9

did u even watch the news when it happened.....there was a f*cking plane sitting right there in the middle of the field......that was a plane and not a d*mn animal u nut........pay attention and stop saying there was no wreckage.....plus the pentagon was f*cked up too so there was damage there.....


if your gonna ask stupid questions be prepared for mean answers cuz americans wont stand for this sh*t that ur askin about wreckage when everybody watched it on t.v.

Answer 10

I've heard a theory that claimed since the ground in which the plane crashed was over an abandoned mine, the dirt was super soft and absorbent and when the plane impacted, it just shattered and was swallowed up by it. ...Do you buy that? I don't.