I belive it is a copout for anyone to vote along party lines, if the canidate does not represent how you feel. I also think it is wrong for states to TELL you to choose a party before you can vote. I choose to be nonpartisian and I vote for who I think will do a better job. Is this not a form of descrimination. What do you think
2006-12-04 04:07:18 · 4 answers · asked by FC 3 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
I agree with you. I always vote for the person whom I think will do the best job. Those people who vote a straight ticket are being ridiculous. I mean this is too important for people to just stick to one thing because of their political party. It doesn't make any sense to me.
2006-12-04 06:31:41 · answer #1 · answered by sexmagnet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely agree, I hear people say that bipartisanship is the only way it works, but I think thats crap. I can't stand people that just subscribe to some system that best fits their ideas. I think parties are just a way of putting too much power in people's hands. It drives me nutz how if you aren't THE candidate from a party you don't have a shot
2006-12-04 12:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by chavito 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they are only grabbing party choices for statistical information. I understand your feeling though. I do believe you can choose to be undecided when asked, but am not 100% sure.
2006-12-04 12:17:39 · answer #3 · answered by blisstar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most people vote for the people they like the gov can't control that even tho they try
2006-12-04 12:15:16 · answer #4 · answered by marion r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋