do you think oj simpson is guilty of those murders? was he set up?

Question

i think he did it. its common sense. all of that evidence cannot be ignored. who else would've killed them? oj had a motive, and he had a history of violence and abuse. he was just rich, so he got off.

Answer 1

You're right. OJ did it, he knows it, and I think someday - when he's very old and lonely, he'll admit it.

He's a rotten, evil person....Karma is a ***** - and it'll catch up to him, believe it!

As for now, he got off because the LA DA and others in the "system" really screwed up that case. Goes to show you, if you have lots of money and fame, you'll walk!

Answer 2

OJ has always maintained his innocence and a great portion of his recent book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later was heard on tapes played in court making extreme racist statements about blacks and then committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments (used "N" word 42 times).
- The chief investigator of the entire case admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scenes.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting scientific points about OJ not being the one who did this unfortunate crime.

Answer 3

If the detectives had no longer been so ******* racist and out to charm to close a celebrity., they could have received a glance for warrant that is needed with the aid of regulation, to enter the living house of a suspect and seek for, plus eliminate evidence. i'm very a lot into crime & undercover agent video clips, and under no circumstances in my existence have I seen or study a case the position the entire criminal gadget, which incorporates the forensic crew screwed up a case that allowed a assassin to stroll being got here upon "no longer to blame". (Why do you imagine all of them stop their jobs and went into something else??). I consistently believed that Oj, and his son committed the crime jointly. at the same time as the decision got here down, to this present day I keep in ideas being on accountability in a well being facility (received't call), the position an entire scale insurrection broke out between the white docs and the black docs. (i'm speaking an easily fist wrestle). the final public of black human beings felt he change into no longer quilty and the final public of white human beings felt he change into high quality. my own own opinion each man or woman that had a hand contained in the proseution of Oj, Simson must be charged with first degree homicide X 2 for failing to do the job that they took and were paid to finish. because of those ********, 2 human beings are lifeless and Oj, enjoys existence being a loose guy. Minddoctor, France

Answer 4

Guilty of Murdoch.

Answer 5

Guilty as sin.

Answer 6

guilty

Answer 7

guilty on all counts

Answer 8

Yes he did it.

Answer 9

he did it