You have to admint it BEATS Bush or Cheney.
Pssst, who knows what will happen after investigations against bush and cheney begin, we can only hope...
2006-12-04 03:22:03 · 19 answers · asked by Informed Liberal 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LMAO the far right is probably foaming at the mouth! Yep, I think it has a nice ring to it too!! I support her! She can't do any worse than what's in there now, and she'll probably do better! Go Nancy!
ROFLMAO!! Great question!
2006-12-04 03:25:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Are you out of your mind??? Pelosi is the scaryiest thing to happen to US politics. She's not just a mere moronic liberal but she's a full on socialist.
Regardless of the reason, extremist radical Muslims want to kill you and me. I am no fan of Bush but at least he has the right idea when it comes to defending this nation.
Pelosi and her ilk are the best friend Ahmadinejad has in the US.
What liberals cannot get through thier thick skulls is that Iran wants to destroy America. They are actively building nuclear arms to destroy Isreal and America. That is their stated objective. They cannot be reasoned with because they are so completely filled with hatred. Their attack on America is not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when".
With Democrats in control the "when" will be sooner rather than later. If we could ever get real conservatives back in office (the Republicans in the house, senate and white house are liberals posing as conservatives) maybe we will fight this war to win.
2006-12-04 03:50:19 · answer #2 · answered by Robert L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Pelosi is two heartbeats from the Presidency with the aid of distinctive feature of political affirmative action. She has shown to be a gutless and incompetent chief, e.g., impeachment of Bush II and Cheney is off the table. you do not take a Constitutional accountability off the table. fool! Palin change right into a hail-mary marketing campaign present from John McCain that keeps on giving. She change into, is, and could be a funny tale as a political candidate, yet perhaps no longer as a communique tutor hostess in case you may stand her shrill and nasal monotone and paintings round her pathetic lack of expertise.
2016-11-23 16:09:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She needs to spend the next 2 years steering congress, not running for President.
2006-12-04 04:52:56 · answer #4 · answered by thehiddenangle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, definitely! I'd vote for her in a minute. She seems honest, sensible, not into senseless wars.
2006-12-04 03:27:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sounds very good to me.We need hope again after the Bush Cheney disaster
2006-12-04 03:24:47 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Yes. Better than Bush or Cheney.
2006-12-04 03:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋
You are serious? A political coup d'etat will defeat the dems quicker than a jackrabbit in a carrot shop.
Nancy has no clue how to run things. Look at her first two appointments to "leadership" roles.....and you think she is good?
2006-12-04 03:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Nope, don't like where shand on a lot of issues.
2006-12-04 03:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by Richard 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only to the uninformed.
2006-12-04 04:04:27 · answer #10 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋