2006-12-04 03:18:19 · 17 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gore won the 20000 election but didn't become president. But if he had, he probably would have listened to the intelligence warnings therefore the 9-11 attacks might have not happened. If they did happen, we would have captured Osama Bin Forgotten by now and all of our troops would be in Afghanistan right now instead of part inn Afghanistan and part in Iraq. one thing is clear though, we wouldn't be having a budget deficit and we would be paying down the national debt right now as we speak.
2006-12-04 05:04:41 · answer #1 · answered by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Non issue. There was never a chance of Al Gore being President. The election was decided long before the first vote was cast.
2006-12-04 03:46:52 · answer #2 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the guy who theory that posing for Rolling Stone change right into a reliable marketing campaign bypass? the guy who claimed to have invented the internet? the guy who threw a mood tantrum at the same time as he lost the election in 2000 (they did numerous recounts and Bush consistently got here out ahead)? Is that the Al Gore you're speaking about?
2016-11-23 16:07:55 · answer #3 · answered by money 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know this is hypothetical.. but he could hardly have done a more discredited and maligned job than the present incumbent.
BTW.. Millions of Americans to this day believe that Gore DID win the 2000 elections. They were stolen from him and the present incumbent was 'selected' by the supreme court. Period.
2006-12-04 03:29:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Gore was elected by the popular vote, and since my crystal ball is fuzzy Id guess wed be much better as we wouldnt of invaded Iraq and maybe we would have consentrated on Bin Ladden and caught him
2006-12-04 03:54:27 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Worse off. After 9/11 Gore would have " . . . fired a million-dollar cruise missile at a five thousand dollar tent and hit a camel on the butt."
Al Quaeda would still have a secure base in Afghanistan and AQ would have struck in the US again, and again, and again.
Can you see Gore doing anything without taking a public-opinion poll first?
2006-12-04 03:27:55 · answer #6 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Better.Much better.
He won the popular vote,but Bush called his brother Jeb to "send the boys out"(meaning police) to block roads with truckloads of votes from Jews who never fell for Bush's "I'm a uniter not a divider crap".
Six yeras later,the GOP has shown that's the best it can do.
Thanks for a "liberated" Iraq,George.
What is he doing,destroying the world?
Al Gore would be above the careless messes of Bush.Period.
2006-12-04 03:22:56 · answer #7 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
We would definitely be better off! We more than likely wouldn't be involved in a disastrous war with no end in sight, we would possibly still have the surplus that Clinton left us, and we would have a president with a brain!
2006-12-04 03:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by tangerine 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It would be the same. All presidents are elected by and backed by THIS secret and evil group that's been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-12-04 03:57:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
It would have to better than where we are at now.
I dont care for Gore, but he would probally be better than Bush.
2006-12-04 03:22:05 · answer #10 · answered by brock 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋