English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-04 02:48:15 · 12 answers · asked by Ms.Show Stoppin 1 in Sports Football (American)

12 answers

no.been there did that got the t-shirt and the hat.

2006-12-04 03:23:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm not sure who Ohio State should be playing, but I think the voting system is a joke. I don't like the way Florida leapfrogged Michigan, and I believe it was done because the voters really didn't want a rematch.

I'm not taking anything away from Florida, and you can make the argument for them as much as any team in the country, especially since the SEC has been getting jobbed for the past few years.. I just think the system is faulty.

2006-12-04 10:52:22 · answer #2 · answered by Craig S 7 · 1 0

Sure in a Big 10 conference championship game. The Big 10 needs to go to 12 teams. Ohio St would have had to play Wisconsin and if they got by them then you have your rematch. The Big 10 is behind the times.

2006-12-04 11:03:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Those who follow college ball should know that the National Championship was played on Nov. 18th. OSU and UM are unagruably the best teams in the country, but UM lost. No doubt the Gators will make for an interesting game on jan 8, but Michigan had their chance and lost. So NO REMATCH! Anyways, screw blue,... go Bucks...

2006-12-04 11:14:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If they let them play for it...it shows that it is about time to start the playoff system....Michigan had their shot and lost...It is Florida's turn for a shot at it.

I am tired of everyone talking about the screwed up BCS...why can't the presidents and A.D.'s get together and finally make a decision on this problem...every year someone is going to get screwed over this system....we did in 2004 when we went 13-0 in the SEC and Oklahoma and USC played for it and USC only played 2 to 3 good teems that year..

This system S U C K S!!!

2006-12-04 11:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by Batman has left the building 3 · 0 0

Yes. The 2 play regardless every year. The 2 best teams should be playing for the championship. Michigan shouldn't be punished for playing Ohio every year.

2006-12-04 11:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by ropemancometh 5 · 0 1

y dont they just have the computers go up until the last week..rank the top 5 teams...and have coaches of the other ranked teams vote who they believe should be in the national championship..and not give a vote to the top 5 since they wouldve obviously vote for themselves and a weaker opponent...to answer ur question..i think ohio st should be in..other than that, michigan lost to them already, so im not really sure why they would be in or should be in again

2006-12-04 11:07:14 · answer #7 · answered by Michael D 5 · 0 1

I think if they did then it would be a good game. With the same outcome though. Then, if Florida won their bowl game (whichever they would have been sent to) all we'd hear until the start of the next college football season, is how Florida should have or could have played and beaten OSU.

Now instead, we have to hear how Michigan got "robbed". Give me a break.

2006-12-04 10:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by sgtcej 2 · 0 0

no way...Michigan had their shot at Ohio State and didn't get it done...same way that if Michigan would have won that game I would firmly believe OSU didn't deserve a rematch.
say they gave Mich the rematch and they happened to pull a win out of their backside...you mean to tell me they deserve the NC over OSU for splitting 1-1 against them? no way man

2006-12-04 10:55:52 · answer #9 · answered by thuglife 5 · 3 1

I'm with the people who didn't want a rematch -- Michigan had their chance at OSU. Florida had a tougher schedule.

2006-12-04 10:57:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes. The first game was worth of a championship game in itself.

2006-12-04 10:57:47 · answer #11 · answered by fostermark_2000 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers