Media is unbiased.?

Question

How can I prove that the media today is unbiased?
We have a debate in speech.

Answer 1

Approach the topic by detaching yourself from the subject matter and start with fundamentals of any debate:

1) Get a clear understanding of what a bias is--define it literally.
2) Define what one would have to demonstrate to not be biased--what is the antonym. Doesn't matter if it is media or not, lay out criteria independent of subject.
3) Show how the media can be measured against your criteria--if they were operating in the fashion defined in #2, what would they likely be doing.
4) Cite examples of this ideology--Journalism textbooks, what are professional organization mandates (doctors take hippocratic oath, anything for journalists?)
5) Hedge your point of view--think of the other side's likely points and have ways of shooting them down.
6) Make personal connection/eye contact with your audience/judges, not your adversary.

Answer 2

There is no such thing as unbiased media. There is no such thing as objective journalism (in the CNN description, that is). The best you can hope for is an accurate presentation of the facts. However, seeing as to how many of these facts are disturbing (not one "smart weapon" killed a single high-level Iraqi official during the invasion, for instance), we see the mainstream media substituting the presentation of facts for the spewing of propaganda. For instance, "Saddam is a monster". Of course, no one mentions that the crimes for which he is being tried were committed with American and British support (money, arms, WMD, acquiescence). No one mentions that the CIA put this monster into power.

On another note, can we really call the mainstream media unbiased when it refuses to present the number of Iraqi casualties, when it never interviews Iraqis without calling them terrorists? And I'm focusing on Iraq for if we were to bring in other people not accurately represented by the US's mainstream news vehicles (the Palestinians, South Americans in general, Iranians, Chinese, Russians, etc, etc, etc.), this answer would become a veritable book.

I'm sorry, man, but, if I were your teacher, I would be forced to fail you because you simply can't prove the existence of an unbiased media. Then again, your teacher must be crazy if he or she thinks there is unbiased journalism out there.

Answer 3

I would try to show examples of many different viewpoints expressed on the same subject. That as a whole it is unbiased because you can find every bias. Show that the same newspaper or TV show has articles that "go both ways" on a subject, ie pro-or-anti war.
you could also bring up how much of a stink there is and people losing their jobs when a falsification or fake photo is discovered.
when it is found someone falsified an article.

but i think you are on the losing side.

Answer 4

The BBC has to be the worst at reporting the news - mainly because they have to lick the Governments Bottom - as it is - the state news channel... Sky news - run by Zi£$ionaire Media Mogul Mr Murdoch .. is a wee bit more centred ..but has got carried away with the Poisoned Spy story..their coverage of the Iraq War - I think was the most un-biased - Fox news is a wee bit right of centre - but the babes on it take your mind off the reporting.. If you want real dross news with Pure Un-Biased opinions watch Scotland Today on ITV Scotland -

Answer 5

Nope. Take Fox information as an social gathering. They declare that they are "honest and balanced" yet watch the movie Outfoxed and also you may discover they're a techniques from that. maximum media shops are biased because of company agreements. meaning a employer will provide them earnings the journey that they say a particular element or take a particular section etc.

Answer 6

You need to find data that shows that media show "both sides". For example, if your opponent says that Time magazine is anti-Republican because it criticizes George Bush and your opponent has evidence, show that Time has also criticized, for example, Bill Clinton when he was president. Or show that Time also criticizes Democratic senators or congressman while also criticizing Republicans.

Answer 7

well ... now that dan rather is out, your job should be a LITTLE easier ...

But first you have to be able to prove that they ARE biased in order to successfully win your debate ... so ... good luck

Answer 8

How can you prove something that is not true?