English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who would be better able to defend their position in a debate?

2006-12-03 23:08:59 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

15 answers

Which ever one made the best point

2006-12-03 23:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The atheist. An agnostic is just someone that has no directive and no point to make, they've basically given up on the idea of anything or the ability to prove one way or the other. An atheist can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there indeed is no god of any sort from exhaustive research that is hidden and in plain sight. An agnostic says we cannot prove either way, which is incorrect, because there either is or is not a god plain and simple so the agnostic must be, in the end, proven wrong in their assumptions. 99% of people will not do the indepth research it takes to come to the conclusion that there is no god whatsoever, and we are only told that there is because of one reason: control. The people in power don't want you to know the truth because if you did you'd hang them......the only thing keeping the 80% poor people from killing the other 20% is the idea of a god. be well, Jack

2006-12-04 07:16:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Agnostic are people, believe that it's not possible to have absolute or certian knowlege of everthing. so the existence of God or the afterlife could just be a possiblity according to their beliefs.
Athiest do not beilieve in the existence of God.

be an Agnostic, for the debate. Good luck.

2006-12-04 07:15:43 · answer #3 · answered by tuikip 2 · 1 0

i think it's easier for agnostics because all they have to prove is that there might be or there might not be a higher being, whereas atheists have to show that there isn't which is pretty damned difficult

2006-12-04 07:16:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

An agnostic can go either way whereas an atheist must proove there is no God. Something that can't be proven, IMO, until you actually die.

2006-12-04 07:13:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Atheists. Because we already know what we know, we're not having some kind of mental conflict with ourselves.

2006-12-04 07:11:22 · answer #6 · answered by Tish P 6 · 1 1

the agnostic has the advantage, he doesn't have to prove anything

2006-12-04 07:10:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

agnostics

2006-12-04 22:21:48 · answer #8 · answered by Vile 2 · 0 0

Neither

2006-12-04 09:54:56 · answer #9 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0 1

Neither

2006-12-04 07:15:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers