Why is music today of such low quality and why is talent no longer a requisite?

Question

I know I sound like a Grandma, but REALLY! What passes for music these days! There's still a few good artists now and then but for the most part it's crap. Most of the music I listen to is from the 30s-70s, you know, Cab Calloway, Leo Watson & The Spirits of Rhythm, Hall Johnson Choir, Washboard Rhythm Kings, Fats Waller, Peggy Lee, Otis Redding, Temptations, Fleetwood Mac, Bob Marley, Led Zeppelin...
now let's compare that to today's "music": Lindsay Lohan? Yin-Yang Twins? And people wonder why record sales are so bad.

And James Brown can kick R. Kelly's a*s!

Answer 1

The music is crap because we (the general public) buy it! If we set the bar higher and buy the music of talented people rather than those who MTV and BET tell are best then the standards will change.

Answer 2

There have all ways been artists who were pushed to the fore despite their lack of talent. History has proved though that talent will all ways rise to the fore given enough time for that to happen take Led Zepplin for example with a couple of notable exceptions they were absent from the POP charts for the majority of their career same with Sabbath but both bands developed into very influential groups who influenced 2 generations of musicians and counting. I see the Black Crows the same way Very talented with a terrific catalog. Same can be said for the Metal from the late 70s and early 80s Iron Maiden is resurgent Very talented group. Compare that to The Greg Kin band or the Knack Yeah they had some talent but compare the catalog of any of those to the Zep catalog and you would think them one hit wonders. Don't take the charts or the radio friendly Audible sludge that gets play as anything but what it is and that is Tunes dujour. Talent will always win out in the end there is no substitute for it. I guess time will tell who of the current crop will develop into the star and who will burn up. Just look at U2 I thought they were a flash in the pan when they came out (81-2?) But just look at where they are now and how they are revered.

Answer 3

terrible. genuinely terrible. J.S. Bach ... what a hack. John Michael Talbot. particularly low. U2 ... would desire to stay in Europe. Phil Keaggy ... who taught him to play guitar, superb? Then there are such super secular musicians, superb? Backstreet Boys, Britney Spears. There are stable and undesirable in the two. nevertheless, a number of the main suitable and maximum influential song in the international grow to be written by employing Christians, for Christians. familiar secular song has one objective: to make funds. It would not inspire experimentation or thinking outdoors the field. Songs would desire to slot specially codecs which will paintings in instruments to be performed on the air. they'd desire to be short sufficient to remember immediately. Musicians would desire to maintain particular types to proceed to attraction to particular audiences. it particularly is a recipe for procuring funds, no longer something extra. self reliant musicians have lots extra effective freedom, yet make much less funds. Christian song (as an extremely huge form) is designed to attraction to a lots smaller objective marketplace. The lyrics do no longer exhibit the comparable degree of freedom as does secular song. the backside of musicians from which to convey mutually expertise is a lot smaller as nicely. that would not advise that each physique Christian song is of decrease high quality. There are only extra secular musicians, so there's a greater base to decide on song from there. With Christian song, in case you p.c. to play as many diverse songs as an earthly station, you would be picking from a much broader selection of song. some will unavoidably be extra useful. i think of the proportion of super Christian musicians is concerning the comparable as super secular musicians.

Answer 4

I think music these days is mainly peer group driven by young kids. How do you expect 14 or 15 years old kids to have any taste?

Answer 5

Overproduction, relentless marketing of manufacture junk and a keen sense of who to target with the crap.

Answer 6

I think it is more to do with image, and selling crap music for a profit.

Answer 7

listen to Incubus, Imogen heap, trespassers william, audio slave, dido, brightwood, nickel creek, maroon 5, n welcome yourself back to the 21st century.
i agree on the latter part, the lindsay lohan, yin yangs, other's who could make that list are paris hilton, mob deep, the killers, all them punk rockers n hip hoppers.