I'm not quite getting what you are trying to say but about the war thing we do a thing in this country called voting and congress did vote to invade Iraq Rep & Dems alike even though they act like they weren't there.
2006-12-03 22:26:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by josh m 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
When our nation was attacked on 9-11, we didn't sit around on our hands. We pulled together, intelligence was gathered, and Congress and the President decided to wage war on terrorism, and Iraq was the place.
Immediately after 9-11, a search of Afghanistan was made and Bin Laden not found. A war in Afghanistan wouldn't look any different than the war in Iraq.
And, contrary to the propaganda machine, Republicans are not interested in waging WWIII.
But if you come into our country and kill 3000 people, there will be serious repercussions.
2006-12-04 00:03:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it truly is the predicament for Republicans: they opt to be socially conservative on wedge subject matters (gay marriage, abortion, non secular moral guidelines) with a view to preserve the low/center-income non secular Southern and midwest electorate. it is the purely charm they have with those electorate, and that is their best vote casting bloc. As we see, useful individuals have change into further and extra became off with the aid of those wedge subject matters and the Republican's stance. The useful American electorate are what you want to win elections. The Republican celebration is in a bind, and that i'd anticipate we are able to work out some significant differences interior the celebration, and some significant inner conflict as well. It has already started, with useful Republicans blaming the extremely-Conservatives with dropping common opt for for the celebration. They actual opt to re-evaluate and regulate their rules, in the different case the celebration is toast. -------- @Scooterpoop - incorrect. Republicans lost seats contained in the living house yet retained majority. study the archives you nitwit.
2016-11-23 15:50:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by rengifo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely, Republicans are the war-machine!
WWI - started under Wilson (Democrat)
WWII - started under Roosevelt (Democrat)
Korea - started under Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam - started under Kennedy (Democrat), escalated by Johnson (Democrat)
I think you've been drinking a little too much of the meth-filled liberal kool-aide.
2006-12-03 22:52:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by jerry 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
and that would make al qaeda just an outside agitator correct....i dont see it that way...the problem is al qaeda started the war and the dems dont have the guts to finish it. war, though unpopular and ugly, is sometimes necessary. if you dont like it, come up with a CONSTRUCTIVE idea to stop it...so far no liberal has.
2006-12-03 22:27:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Do you receive your information from Hugo Chavez?
2006-12-03 22:24:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Greg 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
war isn't there only business , putting people in their so called justice system is another one.
2006-12-03 22:26:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by ancientcityentertainment 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope!!! They are for cutting taxes and protecting Americans!!!
2006-12-03 22:57:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe they are inclinded to listen to big business rahter than the intrest of the general public
2006-12-03 22:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
this is what a repugnic#nt looks like : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ano.jpg
2006-12-03 22:14:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by crockoshithunter 1
·
0⤊
6⤋