The part with Frankie Muniz as Cher's "lover".
EEEW GROSS! Was that scene supposed to be funny?! He's just a little child. With everything related to child porn and child molestation going on today I did not find the situation funny at all.
If it had been an adult male actor, paired with a female girl as the "lover", would it have been accepted by the public as comical? I think not.
What's your opinion?
2006-12-03 18:58:35 · 5 answers · asked by Delfina D 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Just checked, he was 18. The scene was meant to be tongue in cheek and it was more satire of Cher dating younger men (people still talk about the bagel boy), and the reverse seems to be reality.
2006-12-04 01:51:22 · answer #1 · answered by Bamabrat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it makes you feel any better, Frankie was 18 at the time, hardly a little boy... still not right though. I think they meant it to be funny.
2006-12-04 03:41:53 · answer #2 · answered by Zorlinda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
grow up n get a life, who cares what u think
2006-12-04 03:07:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i no its sick i couldnt look at some parts in it
i dont no how they made such a gross movie
2006-12-04 03:08:15 · answer #4 · answered by TiGa 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
grow up,
2006-12-04 03:01:41 · answer #5 · answered by Monte L 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋