THEY SAY WWE HAS MORE AND BETTER Wrestlers WELL THAT JUST SHOWS YOU HOW ******* STUPID THESE PPL ARE IN NOT WATCHING TNA
GIVE ME 3 GOOD REASONS TO WATCH WWE???????
2006-12-03 16:03:27 · 24 answers · asked by grant212021 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
First off let me tell you that I do not hate TNA but prefer WWE. I will explain to u why WWE is more better than TNA.
WWE is entertaining and has better promos, storylines and commentators than TNA. The storylines in WWE are always memorable. You cannot watch TV without entertainment and u should be able to admit that yourself.
Better wrestlers in terms of wrestling skills and charisma- In WWE there is variation with the wrestlers which is also the reason they are able to have 3 different brands. There are many different styles of wrestling, personalities and gimmicks whereas TNA has great wrestlers in the x-division but they all fight similar and have no charisma. Their other wrestlers are just washed up WWE wrestlers even Kurt Angle. I can guarantee u that none of Angle's matches in TNA will match up to the standard of classic bouts he had in the WWE. Since he has joined TNA he has lost his charisma which added into making him a star. He has even changed his theme music to something crap which the fans can't chant 'YOU SUCK!' to. WWE has household names like HHH, HBK and Cena. I don't know why WWE haters complain about Cena being champ when in TNA the world champs were boring wrestlers no where near to main event calibure like jarret, RAVEN, Rhyno, Christian etc. at least Cena is popular with the crowd and entertaining. I bet if Cena signed for TNA the cheers he will get by the fans would be deafening.
Extras-
Bound for Glory can't hold a candle to Wrestlemania
the WWE divas are way hotter than the TNA knockouts
2006-12-03 22:20:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
man i like TNA as well, but anybody who's been around wrestling for a long time can tell that the WWE is where it's at...
3 reasons make it 4
1) Vince McMahon - come on dude, he ALWAYS wins against any other promotion
2) HHH
3) Undertaker (even tho he's being wasted on smackdown)
4) wrestlers who are good in the ring AND on the mic (i.e. HHH, Undertaker, HBK, Carlito, Batista, Booker T, Cena (i know you can argue Cena sucks in the ring, but Hogan never had as many moves as Cena has now, so I'd get over that, he puts on a good show and he's better on the mic than anybody in TNA except maybe Jeff Jarrett)
Tna is fun to watch but the fact that they try so many innovative moves makes it much harder to set up one another for those moves and often it's overly obvious what is about to happen due to that. Also they've only got 2, maybe 3 guys who are true headliners and that's Jarrett, Angle, and Sting. Whereas the WWE has many more...HHH, HBK, Orton, Edge, Undertaker, Cena has proven he can be, Batista, Booker T. Hell I'd rather watch the Hardy's than any of the high flyers in TNA.
To me, these 2 are kinda apples and oranges, both fruit but completely different. And as I support Raw as easily the better, I hope TNA sticks around. Competition is good for the business!!!
2006-12-04 02:16:19 · answer #2 · answered by nole6820 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can do better - I'll give you 5
Kurt Angle
The X division
a large, talented tag team division
The canadian destoyer
A.J. Styles
oh, wait. thats all tna...Well i cant think of any.
I can give 3 reasons not to watch thoug
1. sub-par wrestling ability
2. John Cena (also refer to #1 and #3)
3, bad gimmicks and dumb storylines
WWE has more main eventers !?!?!?!?
they have 4 or 5 per show and each roster has 40 ppl
smackdown (Booker, Benoit, Taker, Kane, maybe Batista
Raw (DX, Edge, Cena)
ECW (Big show, Sabu, RVD)
thats thats 12 legit stars on a 120 man roster.
TNA's title picture consists of at least 11 people
2006-12-04 01:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jason A, if you think that Raven and Christian were boring champions as compared to Cena, I sure as hell don't want to meet you in real life. As for your question:
Chris Benoit vs. Chavo Guerrero
DX vs. Orton/Edge
Mr Kennedy
CM Punk
Paul London/ Brian Kendrick
There, I just gave you five good reasons to watch each brand.
2006-12-04 17:06:15 · answer #4 · answered by Keyring 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you want 3 reasons i can give you 5 my friend.
1. We all kno its fake we just like to see how realistic they can make it.
2. Its Entertaining
3. Its not just Wrestling its like a soap opera for men
4. Some stuff is wrong on it but it is the only professional Sport to go over to iraq on its own funds( not recieving money) just to say thanks to the troops
5. If you dont find those 4 questions at least somewhat interesting then you are kinda sorta not all there!
2006-12-04 00:27:25 · answer #5 · answered by Jonathan H 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not gonna make you watch anything you don't want to.More seats at wwe wrestling events for me.
2006-12-04 01:07:14 · answer #6 · answered by The wwe diva of 2010 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's entertaining, the wrestlers and it's way better than TNA
2006-12-04 05:08:15 · answer #7 · answered by RandyOrtonfan84 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To see Umaga kick Cena's a**
To see Mickie James
To see Edge/Orton concerto Rick Flair
2006-12-04 00:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by xblee1 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
1.undertaker,chris beniot,regal,finlay
2.extreme rules matches
3.divas
those 3 are main reasons why wwe is doin ok and is still good.
2006-12-04 01:07:46 · answer #9 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Way more entertaining than TNA or ECW
2. They have Women Champion's belt
3. Jeff Hardy is on it
2006-12-04 16:06:05 · answer #10 · answered by Taylor G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋