2006-12-03 15:46:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Interesting question.
Do you mean "cloning"? I am for cloning human organs, vegetables, livestock, fruit, etc. These cloned products can be use to help others. On the other hand, I am not for cloning domestic animal (pets), babies that will go up for adoption, cloning humans that we don't want to die, etc. There are enough strays and animals in pounds, and I do not believe in playing God by unnaturally extending- or, to a certain extent, unnaturally creating- life. ("Nothing gold can stay.")
2006-12-03 15:57:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean full Human Cloning, I would have to say I'm against it.
There is no real demonstrated 'benefit' to society in bringing a clone into a world of six billion people. There are, however, a number of reasons that people could use such technology for personal benefit which would have nothing to do with the rights of the clone.
There are a host of technological, sociological and legal issues that need to be dealt with before Human Cloning should even be considered, much less allowed.
2006-12-03 15:55:34 · answer #2 · answered by bionicbookworm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me, alot of genetical research and ways to prevent horrible diseases and such is a good thing, in certain doses. But for people to play GOD like THAT scares the CRAP out of me. Someone could take your identity and it would be unbelieviably HARD to get it back, harder then it already is. Your clone could do some really bad things and YOU would be the one to be punished for it and they could get off scott free! Not to mention the HUGE ethicle Issues. I know it's not a great answer but still..
2006-12-03 15:53:04 · answer #3 · answered by peasant_girl_millwalkie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For. Cloning could easily benifit mankind. Need a kidney but no one can or wants to donate? Clones can help. A clone of you matches your kindey perfectly, and your blood type!
2006-12-03 15:48:47 · answer #4 · answered by inkyblack11 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very AGAINST. For a person to exist they need a body, mind and soul to survive. How can a body live without a soul?
2006-12-03 15:49:03 · answer #5 · answered by Miss Suki 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
aginst definatley, that is ludcrus .next youll have akids are us store and go buy a little suzy. If ya want pepole and ya got that kinda money adopt akid or two or five , or spend the money feeding the ones starving to death,
what would ya do with a clone aftetr ya got tired of em?????????? or if they didnt turn out quite rite?????
nobody needs to play God that bad
2006-12-03 15:55:16 · answer #6 · answered by steve h 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am for it if we can create just a heart, kidney, lung.
I am for it if a couple wants a child.
I am against it if all we want to do is to grow a young child and cut out its organs.
2006-12-03 15:53:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely against PEOPLE cloning. just imagine it....whoever has the power could actually MAKE populations of people to however he/she pleased. it could be compared to another holocaust (without the killings).
also, adding on to what laughing man said, it took around 400 tries to make dolly, the cloned sheep...there must have been some ****** up sheep running around. now apply that to ppl...its so wrong.
2006-12-03 15:51:18 · answer #8 · answered by christina rose 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, you know like in everything we are going to make mistakes in the beginning. Can you imaging what the first mistakes of human clones are going to look like.
2006-12-03 15:49:18 · answer #9 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Against. It just sounds very wrong. I'm sure there are much better answers than that, but I haven't thought that much into it.
2006-12-03 15:50:38 · answer #10 · answered by Consuming Fire 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋