They are over-rated and arrogant. It finally caught up with them.
2006-12-03 15:22:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by ragged 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
COME ON!!! usc could beat ucla. the problem was that no one expected ucla to do that well. plus for the record i am A GIANT usc fan, but ucla's defence owned in that game and carrol did not adjust to it. also why would booty throw to chauncey williams 2 times in a row? come on, thats how #2 got up there for the game saving interception. this game was also sooo wierd because every other play there was a false start call, mainly on usc, like wtf refs, let the game go on. ucla did well and pulled it off but they are not a better team. its as if usc beat ucla in basketball. o well we just have to wait till next year for a rematch. GO TROJANS!!!!!
2006-12-05 11:53:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by griffpuss 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you want some analysis, there were two factors:
1. ucla came better prepared than usc
2. ucla's defense shut down usc's offense
no, usc does not suck. no, ucla is not a better team. ucla just played a better game than usc. that's just what happens in sports.
2006-12-04 06:16:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by loveholio 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
They forgot to tell all those Blue Chip Athletes that they had a game against UCLA Saturday !
2006-12-03 15:22:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any team can win or lose on any give day and field. Thats what happened. UCLA just outplayed USC. The refs were even trying to help USC it seemed.
2006-12-03 15:33:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by imsmartkid 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
By scoring less points than UCLA.
2006-12-03 17:19:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is the year of the Gator....first Basketball now this! I love UCLA!
2006-12-03 15:22:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by drewsgatorgirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
UCLA had a better defense. End of story.
2006-12-03 15:25:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by no nickname 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they just came in cocky and unready because they were in 2nd in the BCS...they werent expecting UCLA to put up a fight
2006-12-03 15:22:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by parth s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pete Carroll was busy with other things again.
2006-12-03 18:32:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋