English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

The surface to volume ratio keeps them small for a couple reasons. S^2/V^3. The surface area increases in a squared, exponential manner, while the volume increases in a cubed, exponential manner. Not conducive to a cell carrying on cellular transports, for instance. Enzymes would have a hard time meeting up with their substrates in an ever expanding cell. For an example.

2006-12-03 15:08:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are not microscipc, they are only microscopic to us because we are so much bigger then them that our naked eye can't see them. Other smaller creatures don't need a microscope to see cells.

2006-12-03 23:01:54 · answer #2 · answered by vampire_kitti 6 · 0 2

if our cells where bigger than less nutrients would get inside the cell and more stuff that didnt belong their would get it
if our cells didnt have nutrients than they would die and we would have a big chunk of us missing (if we had large cells)

2006-12-04 17:34:20 · answer #3 · answered by stephie 1 · 0 1

if they wernt, we would all be 50 ft. tall

2006-12-03 23:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by chris l 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers