English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This question can apply to Australia or the United States.

2006-12-03 14:37:41 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

8 answers

In the USA they cannot. The reason is one of substantiation of the evidence and the method of obtaining the evidence. I don't know about Australia.

2006-12-03 14:58:54 · answer #1 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0 0

contained in the mid 70 s, at the same time as i change into in my previous due young ones, i change into in R.O.T.C. and change into qualifying with the M16A1 rifle and that i placed all of my images interior a 6 inch circle at three hundred meters...with conflict factors of interest. My GySgt couldn t have self belief what I had purely performed and theory I had by some ability cheated on the qualifying (he change into status proper there and watched me shoot!). So i change into ordered to redo the qualificaion and the outcomes were quite a lot the same. i change into then ordered to have a watch exam and that i examined as having 20/8 imaginative and prescient which as you understand from examining this thread is amazingly uncommon. many years later I had to have 2 significant decrease back surgical procedures and for numerous months after i needed heavy doses of morphine to administration the discomfort. After coming off the morphine i spotted my vosion wasn t very nearly as acute as before and a visit to my eye regular practitioner reveled that the prolonged use of morphine had absolutely ruined my % up eyesight and that i had to positioned on glasses. My distance imaginative and prescient had replaced slightly yet i change into nonetheless able to study throughway warning signs lengthy before maximum persons might want to even SEE the letters on the signal a lot less absolutely be able to study what the signal stated. And now at age fifty 8 i visit nonetheless obviously see man or woman leaves on timber 2 hundred meters away, yet with each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days that passes I require a sparkling prescription for my glasses so i visit study a e book.

2016-11-23 15:26:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. I knew a guy who was called on by the police, on the quiet, and was never called to give evidence, only hints for things the cops should look into.

2006-12-03 14:44:35 · answer #3 · answered by Clown Knows 7 · 0 0

I know that in the U.S. the testimony of a psychic is not valid.

However, some psychics are right often enough that police depts. make wide and frequent use of their help in uncovering new leads, or even solving crimes.

2006-12-03 14:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by Mac 6 · 0 0

it depend on the state.In Australia i think that they are allowed to be summoned in to court.

2006-12-03 14:48:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No they are used as a tool.

2006-12-03 14:46:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no. visions are often wrong.

2006-12-03 14:38:59 · answer #7 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0 0

No

2006-12-03 14:38:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers