English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

lets say you get one of those things where you have the sperm and egg put together and then put back inside the woman but you have male cat DNA mixed with it would the egg die? would it be born with cat like features? or would it just have cat like genes like being able to see in the dark or jump high if the zygote lived?

2006-12-03 13:46:01 · 9 answers · asked by Peace ☮ 2 in Science & Mathematics Biology

9 answers

Nothing would happen. They are incompatible. It's like trying to play a PlayStation game on Nintendo. Even though mammalian DNA is being mixed, it's so unrelated that nothing productive would happen.

2006-12-03 18:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by RobbieTO 1 · 1 1

Cat DNA and human DNA just don't mix. Each species has a different number of chromosomes so during meiosis, the chromosomes will line up but since the chromosomes do not complement each other (since there are a different number of chromosomes), and meiosis will cease.

Basically imagine putting a large thick piece of cardboard into a printer loading tray. When you try to print something, the cardboard is not the right size and it will cause the printer to jam. Same concept with the chromosomes.

2006-12-03 13:57:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

it could desire to be the reason that maximum scientists don't be attentive to the thank you to return up with a extra effectual answer than what Darwin had. a number of direction supported the creation concept, mutually as now there are increasing quantity of scientists who root for the ideal creation concept, the place animals are definitely created 'as-is', no precursors, no ancestors, merely 'are'. (ideal me if i'm incorrect, people!) i do no longer evaluate Darwin's concept because of the fact honestly the fact. there are various loopholes in it. working example, if this is real evolution occurs because of the fact of isolation, organic decision and a gaggle of different motives, why have not we see any modifications in those Galapagos Island creatures already? The given time-physique is long sufficient for observers to work out some modifications, a minimum of. And if a set of fish start to consume in one among these way that their mouths turn to left, does this warrant the theory as real? i encourage to selection. this is like finding at a clean born infant who's left-surpassed and say that the subsequent human evolution will contain left-handedness. the theory holds up because of the fact the theory because of the fact it solutions a lot of questions. A concept is merely as real because of the fact the questions, and because scientists ask the ideal questions, it maintains to be real. What if the subsequent question positioned via our destiny era can turn the theory on its head, or perhaps topple it over? that's the top of the theory, and the commencing up of yet another concept. i like this sentence because of the fact it places each thing succinctly in place: 'Theories are created via scientists because of the fact they don't be attentive to the real solutions.'

2016-12-29 20:49:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It would not survive. I know this because I dont doubt there have been people who have had sex with animals with no fruition.


However, closely related animals like Donkeys and Horses can breed to make mules. Tigers and Lions can also breed to make Ligers. These so called hybrids can rarely breed themselves.

2006-12-03 13:55:06 · answer #4 · answered by Stu F 2 · 3 0

You get the Hindu God, narasimha, who had the face of a lion and the body of human. And of course, we know that a lion belongs to the cat family

2006-12-03 13:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by Mayur 2 · 0 5

the egg wouldn't become fertilized.. two different species.. so all the other questions aren't relevent..

2006-12-03 13:49:01 · answer #6 · answered by law-inspired 3 · 3 1

there is nothing left to say for the answer because everyone is right

2006-12-03 14:01:54 · answer #7 · answered by Ibrar 4 · 2 1

Dunnananadunnanana....CATMAN!

2006-12-03 14:01:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you would get cat woman! hahahaha.

2006-12-03 13:48:46 · answer #9 · answered by ltonyasfun 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers