come on you lions
2006-12-03 13:37:35 · 14 answers · asked by england til i die 3 in Sports ➔ Cricket
True have you been watching 8 out of 10 cats
2006-12-03 13:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by The Stig 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
nicely, the Aussies as is their wont will play annoying, it is not open to communicate! some gamers play could call the taking part in cards or the photographs like Clarke, Chris Rogers (ask your self), Faulkner, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle, Lyon & Doherty. at instances England ought to be very vulnerable to the colourful Aussie factor yet it rather is it, I complication plenty concerning the Aussie batting, a capability for a lengthy time now. The bowling replaced into constantly promising, a severe high quality crop of quickly bowlers being attainable like Jackson chicken, Hastings, Kane Richardson all with some sturdy %. & flow. besides the fact that, the promising batters have not come by, Khwaja not in prefer, Cowan promising yet not fullyyt sturdy, Warner basically ordinary for pulling the rabbit out of the hat & Maxwell untested at this point. Yea, England easily are the outright favorites, its basically a count of time no count if the Aussies capitulate interior the 1st try or not! which will deliver shivers down their necks & in the event that they're down 3-0, then the Ashes urn comes back to previous blighty
2016-12-18 06:58:58 · answer #2 · answered by bloodsaw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What happend January 1 1901? Oh, Australia becomes a nation! What happens in most Ashes seris? Oh, Australia Wins!!!!!!!!
So your saying that the West Indies, New Zealand, India and South Africa is yours to? And you win all the gold medels at the Commonwelth games?
You enter half the teams in the Football world cup, you dominate the Rugby World Cup with 2/3 of the teams yours?
Fine but don't forget one thing. Everything that "WE" win never sees England!
2006-12-03 20:01:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a wishful thinking as Australia is already one up and second test is heading for a draw. If England have to win the series, they have to win the next 3 Test Matches, which will be
asking too much. Hence Australia have every chance to win the Ashes this time.
2006-12-03 18:06:29 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
btw vakayil k, england only have to win 1 test you doofus. This is because of the rule that in the event of a drawn series, last years' winners get the urn, and who won the ashes last year? I think it might have been england, so get your facts right. it is the convicts who have all the work to do.
2006-12-04 06:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by strettyford 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So, why are you playing in the first place? Isn't the Ashes then just an inter-family friendly match?
2006-12-03 17:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by pressurekooker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Typical Pom cop out. Find the excuse to loose. What a looser.
Lions? Here Kitty
2006-12-03 13:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by ub6 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think in that case England have never lost it either given that way we are supposed to be briitish (not likely) we never won it in the first place which really ain't likely
2006-12-03 13:45:20 · answer #8 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kind of like letting the poor relations hold it for a while, eh?
2006-12-03 18:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WE DON'T NEED THAT
WE ARE CAPABLE OF BEATING THEM
DID YOU SEE COLLINGWOOD THE OTHER DAY?
B.T.W.,THAT WOULD MAKE PONTING AN ENGLISHMAN
THAT'S EVEN WORSE THAN MADONNA STAYING HERE
GOOD WISHES TO THE BRITISH TEAM
2006-12-03 22:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋