2006-12-03 12:06:29 · 4 answers · asked by sbuckman40 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
The UN has been pretty ineffectual, in my opinion, for the last 15-20 years. It seems more of a chat group than a group prepared to take action. I know it does not have its own army but it used to have authority to send troops and encourage its member nations to send troops. But then, there are no easy answers to fanaticism.
2006-12-03 12:16:35 · answer #1 · answered by MUD 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because an incompetent like Koffi Anan was running the peacekeeping force.
2006-12-03 12:14:17 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. J. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
UN is not an acronym but rather a prefix for
UNable
UNwilling
2006-12-04 01:04:12 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason they did nothing for the Bosnians.
2006-12-03 12:10:02 · answer #4 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋