English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Normally you have to look at the ones who have the most to gain out, in this case, the main factor of the event. Which is publicity and conspiracy gossip.

If a professional agency wanted to get rid of someone they just kill him silently, and do not 'nuke' the guy. So it isn't about killing. There's also no 'message' involved since the victim was a lunatic, a fringe conspiracy nut - really not a danger to anyone I think, only an annoyance.

So who has to gain from all the resulting conspiracies, finger pointing, rumors about Putin, trails leading to Moscow?

Could it be Putin's enemies? The ones wanting regime change there?

To me that's the most likely answer, unless this was intended as message from one criminal/political gang to another one, to make a point (perhaps also a 'nuclear' point).

2006-12-03 11:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by Stark 2 · 1 0

probable not. people who're spies artwork in government or technologies or business enterprise. A mail order bride is probable some chick who grow to be a stripper or some thing. i think itt is a probability for a stripper to be a secret agent yet she could could get on the brink of efficient human beings.

2016-12-13 19:23:02 · answer #2 · answered by lonon 4 · 0 0

Treason

Out of the loop too long enough to not realize he was going against the Order by the dealings he was doing. Things change quickly.

2006-12-03 11:11:13 · answer #3 · answered by For sure 4 · 0 0

Gettin rid of him because he was trying to interfere with the Russian occupation of Chechnya.

2006-12-03 11:16:43 · answer #4 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 0

The USSR may be gone, but it's the same old Soviet way of taking care of business for Putin.

2006-12-03 11:32:01 · answer #5 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 0

He was murdered via raidation poisioning. The question is did Putin have him silenced as is believed.

2006-12-03 11:26:35 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0 0

it looks like Putin ordered it or one of his lower level people did, but there really is not much evidence into any of the theories.

2006-12-03 11:06:20 · answer #7 · answered by smartass 3 · 2 0

Putin had him killed. Dissent is not an option. Oh what oh what does that sound like.

2006-12-03 11:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4 0

Putin killed him to shut him up!!

2006-12-03 11:16:40 · answer #9 · answered by SICKO 2 4 · 0 0

...proof that there is no such thing as a x-Russian spy...

2006-12-03 11:07:10 · answer #10 · answered by Rada S 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers