2006-12-03 10:55:51 · 13 answers · asked by Billy 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
TNA is going out and developing new stars and getting old ones unlike WCW who just got old superstars from WWE and went back round. In 5 years TNA will have a bigger fan base then WWE.
2006-12-03 10:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by Joe 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WCW was better than TNA at the moment can ever be. WCW was beating RAW constantly and featured some gr8 wrestlers and got tons and tons of viewers which as to my knowledge TNA dosn't quite get the percentage of viewing that WCW (in its prime) did.
As many ppl have said in the Hulk Hogan/NWO heyday there's no doubt that WCW was the best by far. Just look at some of the wreslters its produced and this easily beats TNA which is getting (no offence here) WWE rejects and more older wrestlers, yes WCW did do this but that was then and TNA is now, if TNA want to beat the WWE (which WCW did in the Monday Night Wars) they will have 2 do something different in my opinion than try and be the new WCW, they need more younger blood and to try and build better storylines for example because they still fall short of the WWE.
2006-12-03 21:03:23 · answer #2 · answered by dafreakysportsguru 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think back in the day WCW was good right behind wwe but in the long run wcw got ran out by wwe so with that in mind i thank that TNA is Better than WCW.
2006-12-03 21:14:25 · answer #3 · answered by tyler g 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WCW was better than TNA is currently. But give TNA a few years and it may make it to the WWE's level.
2006-12-03 20:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WCW and TNA are the same...I was raised on WCW...now that TNA has started taking off..I've pretty much quit watching WWE. TNA is one hour long and has a minimum of 4 matches a night.....WWE is TWO hours long, and you're lucky to have 4 matches a night, and, TNA's matches are so much more exciting...WWE you know what's going to happen
2006-12-03 21:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When Hulk Hogan was in WCW, especially as Hollywood Hogan was when WCW was in their hey day. But WCW was going bankrupt, that's why Vince bought WCW, TNA may be having good story lines, but Vince knows what he's doing, and even though WWE seems like it's getting weak, don't count out WWE.
2006-12-03 20:55:51 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WCW was better in 1990's but then it went downhill fast and now TNA is taking off where WCW left off.
2006-12-04 11:17:52 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i watched wcw and wwf when they were both still good and i thought for sure wwf was going to lose to the alliance at survivor series 01. and now wwe has gotten so pathetic,so lame,so predictable and so boring i wish wcw would still be in business but atleast tna is. so i say wcw was because experience and bigger wrestlers not the losers vince mcmahon has right now but dont get me wrong tna has definetly got the potential and wrestling skills.
2006-12-03 19:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well wcw went belly up so i would say tna
2006-12-03 19:07:58 · answer #9 · answered by kukamongakid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wcw. tna is the new wcw. the anti-wwe
2006-12-03 19:24:12 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas Crown 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋