English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ahmed Nadim, 47 became Crown Court recorder in 2002. His sister Samiah is married to crime boss, tobacco smugggler and VAT fraudster on a massive scale, Asad Hussein Chohan, 37 who half way through a trial at which he admitted to VAT fraud of £5.7 Mn. skipped the country and is thought to be in Pakistan.

Samiah Ali Chohan last week was found guilty of being involved in the crime syndicate her husband ran with his brother and a book keeper and of money laundering involving purchasing a £350,000 property. She received 80 hours community service.

The property involved was bought by Recorder Nadim but he said he did not know it may have been acquired earlier with crime proceeds.

The website of his Young Street Chambers (Young Street Chambers, 76 Quay Street, Manchester M3 4PR ) claims he both fluent in in Urdu and Punjabi and "Ahmed Nadim has a particularly extensive practice in all fields of serious crime"

Further details at:-
http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com/search?q=Ahmed+Nadim

Any comments?

2006-12-03 08:55:34 · 9 answers · asked by kayamat_ka_din 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Sent to 10 Downing St, via website, as suggested.

2006-12-03 21:10:10 · update #1

The Number 10 Web Team


Here is the text we received:



RE: Law and Order
Dear Mr Blair

I write this with great concern for the British Judiciary.
This has been seen in Asian Voice, Saturday 2nd December 2006 as well as at a website.
http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com/search?q=Ahmed+Nadim

I can not believe this is entirely baseless. These kind of things are very well known in India & Pakistan.

Ahmed Nadim, 47 became Crown Court recorder in 2002. His sister Samiah is married to crime boss, tobacco smugggler and VAT fraudster on a massive scale, Asad Hussein Chohan, 37 who half way through a trial at which he admitted to VAT fraud of £5.7 Mn. skipped the country and is thought to be in Pakistan.

2006-12-03 21:22:32 · update #2

Samiah Ali Chohan last week was found guilty of being involved in the crime syndicate her husband ran with his brother and a book keeper and of money laundering involving purchasing a £350,000 property. She received 80 hours community service.

The property involved was bought by Recorder Nadim but he said he did not know it may have been acquired earlier with crime proceeds.

The website of his Young Street Chambers (Young Street Chambers, 76 Quay Street, Manchester M3 4PR ) claims he both fluent in in Urdu and Punjabi and "Ahmed Nadim has a particularly extensive practice in all fields of serious crime"

2006-12-03 21:23:22 · update #3

9 answers

You need to take this further - write to your MP, and send a copy of the letter to Prime Ministers Office and the CPS.

2006-12-03 09:37:40 · answer #1 · answered by Safety First 3 · 1 1

Anyone with the slightest common sense would ask if there is a connection.
The latest I hear is that Manchester Crown Court Recorder Ahmed Nadim is to be asked pertinent questions by the Lord Chancellor.

Hope Mr Ahmed Nadim can prove his case.

2006-12-04 08:42:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I my sister was married to a crime boss I would like to think that I would not suffer because of it. Ahmed Nadim has got himself a good job and I don't see any reason as to why he should be penalised because an in-law is a criminal. Good on Ahmed for getting where he has, and if there is any evidence of any wrong doing on Ahmeds part let it be head in front of a Jury.

2006-12-03 12:08:09 · answer #3 · answered by Mr Slug 4 · 1 2

It became on the community television information very last evening stormy. seems he became shopped by community electorate and the police stormed his flat to locate £7,000 of cocaine which he claimed became for his personal use. there became a image of him outdoors court and he appeared something yet a Rabbi, yet i believe that Rabbi purely ability instructor and there are distinct sects of Judaism. A rabbi in orthodox Judaism isn't like a rabbi in say Kaballah.

2016-11-30 02:26:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

in my opinion if you have solid evidence that he has done something wrong criminally then you should firstly bring it to the attention of the authorities in the court he is working in and they can take it further.
whatever you do DO NOT try to start a witchhunt or personal vendetta or you could find yourself in some really serious trouble.

2006-12-03 10:24:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What a surprise! The Law, the Government! It's barristers etc... one massive cartelle! No surprises here!

Peace!

2006-12-03 09:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by AZRAEL Ψ 5 · 1 0

I think this may be libellous,you shouldn't post this stuff here,you might get into serious trouble.I don't like the idea of guilt by association,have you got proof that Mr.Nadim has committed a criminal offence?If so,then report it to the police.

2006-12-03 09:04:33 · answer #7 · answered by michael k 6 · 0 2

I'm totally easy about the situation

2006-12-03 09:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Makes a change from "What's Your Favourite Lager?" :-)

2006-12-03 08:58:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers