Can you imagine the muff - er, mug - shot? There need to be police posted everywhere she might get out of a car so they can arrest her skanky behind.
Accidental is doing it once. She's been caught like four times in a week - that's not accidental.
2006-12-03 10:26:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Taffy Saltwater 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've got nothing against her new personalilty. She's a lot hotter than Lindsy and Paris combined. I'd rather Brit be who she is than pretend to be some innocent princess that she isn't. Christina Aguilera realized this early on and quickly changed her image. Britney didn't. It's about time she left that piece of **** K-Fed and got a life of her own.
2006-12-03 15:49:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. it was accidental, and we wouldnt even know about it if 1,000 photographers hadn't been surrounding her.thats like charging a guy with indecent exposure because his fly was down
2006-12-03 16:23:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by kitkat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. brit should not be charged with indecent exposure.
2006-12-03 15:37:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, if a guy did that he'd be in jail. In California celebrities get away with everything, including murder.
2006-12-03 17:35:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
nah alot of ppl dont wear underwear which is gross ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
2006-12-03 17:37:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by the_blue_martini_69 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no...she should be charged with "marrying a loser", "not quitting while she was ahead" and the most heinous crime of all..."stupidity".
2006-12-03 15:39:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by too funny 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your right
2006-12-03 15:40:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by CLARABELLE 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
she should be charged
2006-12-03 19:43:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stephanie :) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
she should of course
2006-12-03 15:52:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋