English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Most of use have heard of the conspiracy theory about September 11th, at leased in the U.S. You Know that one about the U.S. government attaching U.S. soil to go to war with Iraq to get more oil. Well if you've heard of it do you think it makes any sence or more importantly, IS IT TRUE? Give your opinion!!

2006-12-03 07:03:01 · 16 answers · asked by Michael R 1 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Here's a clue. Take a spelling lesson. Don't waste your time here. Look at the facts. How much oil have we brought home?

This is simply untrue.

2006-12-03 07:17:31 · answer #1 · answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4 · 1 1

Let me tell you a story about a guy named Michael Moore who had a dream - a very bad, untrue, fabricated and exaggerated dream. He made a movie called Fahrenheit 9-11, which was based on half-facts and outright lies. However, he made it into a movie, falsely called it a "documentary", and because it could make money during an election, was granted distribution through a movie distribution outlet that wanted to make a lot of money, and very fast.

Since we have a bunch of liberal activists who hated Bush anyway, this was the perfect vehicle for these people to:

1. Do the research on their own and decide if the facts were true OR
2. Sit back, watch the movie, and blindly accept every premise that was offered.

Since the US has a population raised on TV, guess which happened? (Here's a hint: Nobody went to the internet or the library - it was apparently much easier to just be a sheep and repeat the propaganda)

Since Fahrenheit 9-11, these "facts" have been brought up, debunked, but it seems that nobody on the left bothers to learn anything. It's not "all about oil".

It's about terrorism, Islamofascism and fighting a war.

Bush chooses to fight a war on THEIR land, which I agree with. What these Moore-heads forget is that terrorists brought the war to America, and we are working to make sure that doesn't happen again.

So no, "War for Oil" is not true.

2006-12-03 07:14:12 · answer #2 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 2 3

O.K. It's September not Sempember
and 9 in 9/11 stands for September.
and the conspiracy is not thrue.

2006-12-03 07:47:54 · answer #3 · answered by Rusheml 1 · 1 0

Untrue theory.
-Why would the government attack it's biggest military installation? Americans supported War on Terror right after Twin Towers were hit. The Pentagon being hit would not have influenced anyone's anger even more.
-Why can't theorists put together how everything connects in those theories?
-Why would the Israelis have to do with it? Their only big support is from us, and if Americans turned on them, they would be in trouble.
-Why were surveilance videos relaesed, showing the hi-jackers at the airports on 9/11?
-Why were ticket desk attendents be able to go on TV and describe what happened that day, without falting and trying to think of descriptions?
-If Bin Laden was working for the government, why would we almost kill him twice in raids?
-Why would the government want to start wars? It just costs them money.
-Why would childhood friends of bin Laden be able to aduquately describe how he got influenced to become the violent person he is today if he does not actually exist?
-If bin Laden is fake, why does he have a ton of family members with the same last name living today?
-The websites of these theories flip flop. Some say there were people on the plane, and others say there was no one on the plane that day. If there was no one, why are there people who can prove they lost a family member that day, and why do these sites glip flop?
-We hated terrorists before, as they blew up part of the USS Cole years back, and that angered many people as it was.
-We have hated radical Islam actually since 1979, when American hostages were hed in Iran, and many Americans would have supported a war then on terror.
-Why would we need an excuse to invade Iraq, when we helped Iraq in their campaign against Iran in the 80's? Many people say that Bush Sr. Started the Gulf War over oil, but if he wanted oil, Saddam would have happily given it to him, because of our previous dealings with him, and our support of him.

See whatI'm saying? I once believed those theories, but they always flipped flopped, and none of them explained how every terrrorist event in part of this so called "conspiracy" connected. You are not a fool for believing these theories. You are just suspicious of the government, as many of us are.

2006-12-03 07:07:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Presidential National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski outlined it twenty years ago as the principle American “Imperative.” Meaning - To survive, we MUST conquer. But what of all those nations that we will be conquering? According to Brzezinski and his cabal of adherents in the Military and State Department and industry for whom his writings are like a biblical tome - it’s for their own good. His book is titled "The Grand Chessboard."

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

This video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.
http://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

2006-12-03 15:58:04 · answer #5 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 1 0

I even might want to echo Raymond's reaction - how can you no longer comprehend? What are they practise you in college? in any case, the valid tale is that a set of radicals from a Revolutionary Organization 17 November referred to as Al-Quaida hijacked 4 jumbo jets on the morning of 9/11. The terrorists received administration of the cockpits and killed the pilots. They then crashed a million airplane into each and every of the towers that made up the international commerce midsection, and a million airplane crashed into the Pentagon. Passengers on the 4th airplane discovered about the previous crashes, and wanting to strive against decrease back hostile to the terrorists. The 4th airplane crashed in a field, supposedly it became targeted on the White abode. The terrorists all belong to an really radical and violent sect of Islam, yet to say they were Muslim, is like calling KKK contributors Christians. Yeah, they declare to be non secular, yet no faith advocates the cowardly, indiscriminate killing of civilians with the intention to make some twisted political actuality. maximum human beings knew next to no longer something about Islam, Muslims, or perhaps the midsection East, yet now they with out note knew "they" had to kill us. it really is a lot a similar element that got here about even as the jap attacked Pearl Harbor. with out note ALL jap human beings were seen to be evil. there are fairly some conspiracy theories about who became truly responsible for the attacks, and such issues as that yet they are all purely garbage. in element of actuality, some terrorists had to attack united statesa. (which they have finished contained in the previous - which includes attempting to blow up the international commerce midsection) and managed to get very, VERY fortunate with their strikes. each person stupid adequate to objective to hijack an American airplane now will finally end up with each and every of the passengers attacking the fool with such ferocity, I doubt even his mom will be able to locate the continues to be even as the airplane lands.

2016-11-30 02:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What we need is a serious investigation of 9/11...not stacked with Bush cronies deciding what area,s to look at. Did you know we spent 45 million dollars on Clinton's BJ, but only 15 million on 9/11 ...whats up with that?...we need to know.

2006-12-03 07:09:14 · answer #7 · answered by dstr 6 · 2 0

The pilots on the 4 planes were all Robots programed by an undisclosed programming expert, the Robots were all wearing traditional Arab clothing, so it would appear as though they were actually terrorists, yet those of us who know the true facts know that they were robots and could not have been Islamic terrorists because that would not allow us to go to war against terrorists. We must assume that it was our Government or we could not blame the terrorists if they actually did pilot the planes that killed 3,000 people. I certainly am glad you helped me see this logical explanation.

2006-12-03 07:14:18 · answer #8 · answered by SICKO 2 4 · 1 3

the jews who control the world used the attacks as a pretext for a war on behalf of israel the same thing as pearl harbor

2006-12-03 08:10:42 · answer #9 · answered by the wise one 2 · 1 1

Psychotic a--hole Islamic terrorists hijacked 4 planes. That's what happened.

2006-12-03 07:05:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers