What was about it that people didn't like?
2006-12-03 06:57:27 · 6 answers · asked by l2wh 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It was just a bad movie.
2006-12-03 07:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by parrothead2371 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The film itself received poor reviews, getting a 0 out of 5 from Rolling Stone. However it was not the performances, but the plot that critics seemed to attack comparing it to the highly successful predecessor
2006-12-03 07:07:36 · answer #2 · answered by Adrian B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a bad movie. I'm surprised it didn't go straight-to-video. It wasn't even so-bad-it's-good. It was just really boring and way too long.
2006-12-03 16:23:11 · answer #3 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not enough people plopped down their cash to see it. Nobody can answer for others. You would have to ask each to get an answer.
2006-12-03 07:05:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's see: zero plot, washed up hag, and insulting to viewers. Why would it be successful?
2006-12-03 07:02:13 · answer #5 · answered by yogineocon 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that movie had to be the worst sequal of all time
2006-12-03 07:05:19 · answer #6 · answered by hazeallday 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋