2006-12-03 06:37:28 · 35 answers · asked by tmh62001 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I suggest using Aachen's Razor i.e. all things being equal the most logical conclusion is the correct one.
You have to believe one of two things to be true here.
1) A man who has a history of domestic violence and serious control issues snapped and murdered his estranged wife, and then killed a possible witness.
2) The entire Los Angeles' police department and forensics labs worked together to frame a beloved sports hero and thus allow a real killer to go free.
2006-12-03 06:53:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It has become passé to remark that race has been central to the OJ Simpson case, and even now, seven months after the verdict the reaction to him is still divided along the same racial lines (with a majority of whites thinking him guilty and a majority of blacks thinking him innocent). Bill Clinton remarked on this "simple truth that white Americans and black Americans often see the same world in drastically different ways". Simpson's trip to Britain this week has produced a very similar reaction here -- on the Radio 5 call-in show the pro/anti OJ camps divided in terms of black and white.
No doubt this belief plays a part in why most blacks believe Simpson to have been framed, but it's important to note that the racial divide was present from the very beginning of the case -- before the "framing" defense had been seriously advanced. From the evening of that famous slow-speed chase of the white Bronco, black and white Americans were already divided about OJ Simpson's guilt or innocence. The idea of a racist police force then built on and strengthened an already existing predilection among black Americans to believe him innocent.
THATS IN MY OWN OPINION!
2006-12-03 07:16:39 · answer #2 · answered by Wimpyyy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
O.J. Simpson is not innocent. They found ONE of the bloody gloves at his house and ONE at the crime scene. HIS BLOOD WAS AT THE CRIME SCENE. And he has a flight to Chicago or somewhere that night. What do you think??
:)
2006-12-03 06:44:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Would an innocent person hurt their children by writing a book that says
"Hey, I'm not the one who killed your mom, but if I had, this is what I would've done!" ?
No, he is not innocent and our country serious needs to reevaluate and revise our double jeopardy laws....
2006-12-03 08:32:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he is not innocent. He just wasn't convicted as guilty. But that does not make him innocent by a long shot.
2006-12-03 06:49:00 · answer #5 · answered by goldensparkler61 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The whole trial turned into a Civil Rights ordeal. I believe he is guilty.
2006-12-03 07:42:46 · answer #6 · answered by BetsyJ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guess it depends on what you mean innocent of:
I think the trials got it right; he didn't do it but he sure in the heck knows who did and propbally had something to do with it.
But then again just like everyone but Nicole, Ron and the killer(s)we are all just giving our opinions.
2006-12-03 06:44:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
hell no he isnt innocent... he got away with murder... i mean he said the leather glove wouldnt fit... what happens to leather when it gets wet? it tends to shrink. and that book me wrote about how he would do it if he infact did do it... thats a big sign that he really did do it but got away with it...
2006-12-03 06:59:23 · answer #8 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but when the LAPD takes evidence home for the weekend, he had to be let off. Nobody thinks he is innocent, but he got off cause the system works.
2006-12-03 06:45:20 · answer #9 · answered by cosmiccastaway 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
O.J. is NOT innocent.
2006-12-03 06:39:10 · answer #10 · answered by Lori E 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋