I want to write about wether he was a weak dictator or master of the third reich. How would i go about answering this question? Any recommendations for historians or books on this issue?
2006-12-03 05:27:04 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
You have to look at both sides before coming to your own conclusion, i.e. you could argue that he was a strong dictatorship because of the dominant role he played, or that he was weak because he relied heavily on other top nazis, make sure to use quotes to back up your arguments.
Allan Bullock "Hitler a study in Tyranny" this book is a good place to start your research.
2006-12-03 07:04:18 · answer #1 · answered by isthisinuisetoo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler... hate to say it but a very smart man, but he just had the wrong ideas. He was a great speaker... I did a paper on him and the Einsatzgruppen (Mobile Killing Units) that is some scary research that one can find all on line. Tons of information about him. I found it difficult to keep it within the maximum limits of the paper.. 15 pages.
2006-12-03 13:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by dontblamemeivoted 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was DEFINITELY a master of the third reich, in my opinion.
He brainwashed kids into turning in their own parents for pete's sake!
He also, during the time of concentration camps, killed 1.5 million people, by plan of genocide.
2006-12-03 13:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by Yamster 2.0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler was a genius. I don't think his actions or his beliefs were in any way commendable, but he was highly intelligent. He just used his power for evil, and that's a shame. Too bad he didn't use it to create peace.
2006-12-03 16:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by queensassey 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋