News Media Industry?

Question

Do you think the industry is competitive?

Answer 1

Yes I do. The American Paid Media is constantly attempting to drown out it's competitive counterparts. Reason being b/c the press is an outlet for covert politics, and an auction block for political agendas. Each news story you hear is the final product of the slot that was bought by whatever politician or activist thereof to blast off the fabricated versions of the events that happen. Or some random slant to an unrelated story. Individual companies and entities in our paid media industry and censored press venues need to keep the cash flowing. When politicians and celebrities and religious activists and merchants see that the people are reacting favorably to the stories they have fabricated for our viewing pleasure, they will continue to do business with that particular company. It is a very very harsh environment even more cut-throat than the corporate world. They are constantly juggling calculated and biased lies to be passed off as independent press coverage, and they need to regulate the highest bidders, and deal with ratings. It is one of the very few constant industries with no shortage of demand in the US. Everyone buys a slot and turns a blind eye, while they wait for the results. And there is no constraint, no inhibitions, no definitive taboo, and no boundaries. Just a few simple rules. Ya don't ever let on that you are not an independent reporter, you NEVER hit the stories that bring too much substantial proof against your primary benefactors. Always carry the big stories and high end jobs first, public interest and small time investigations are fine, but don't invest a lot into them, they will either hurt your paychecks, or serve to be frivolous waste of company spending. And once you are on payroll, be relentless. You need your benefactors support more than anyone else's. B/c when it's all said and done, the people are just ratings and statistics, but if your employers still like you, you are untouchable. If the media was unbiased and truthful, major networks on TV and in the papers and the radios would have no need or place for them. If the news was an establishment independent of popular media, there would be a collaborative effort made on it’s own time and it’s own money and stations. There would be no need to compete for ratings or being seen as the most reliable and unbiased newscast in the nation. They are the merchants palate, they do what they’re told and nothing more. And they are constantly censored for the sake of the American people and the benefit of American business and government.

Answer 2

No way. As media clientele, i've got self assurance that it quite is our activity to determine which memories are based moreso on fact than opinion and the least complicated thank you to achieve this is thru getting our information memories from distinctive sources. Face it, almost all information memories are a approach or the different biased and skewed, yet once you examine, see and hear the comparable tale from distinctive sources, then you definately would be extra constructive able to get the data. allowing the government to make certain what's actual and what isn't might supply the government too plenty ability over what they deem actual or no longer.

Answer 3

No, especially in respect of new sites providing alternative business models like http://commentspro.com , and alike.

Answer 4

no the media needs to be diversified, at the moment its all the same opinion (pro-West) being thrown at you in their constant fear campaign.

Answer 5

Do you mean is it hard to get a job, and cut throat to get ahead (yes) or do you mean is competition between corporations fair (I dunno)

Answer 6

yeah of course

Answer 7

No, I believe it is collaborative.