a couple around 40 with a 16yrs son.they had divorced 10 years ago.but they still love each other.the problem is about their son who's actin madly ,he needed his parents to be together.
2006-12-03 04:17:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
A 16 year old; he's on his way to growing up, nothing the parents do now will make him act any better, it seems to me the young man should take this attitude, two people got together and got him here on this earth be thankful. At 16 he is pretty much his own. He just must say to himself, I'm responsible for my actions now and I know how to act right and I will. That simple. Most of the people I know can tell you the "wow poor me, I had a bad childhood". When we, I say WE are responsible for ourselves whether our parents are here or not. Think about the kids that don't have even one parent, let alone two that he can hang with. So Good Luck.
2006-12-03 04:36:16 · answer #1 · answered by Conrey 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this could be a undemanding concern in horror movies, the place the monster/ghost/ghoul/spirit/serial killer, etc, kills the protagonist in the top to strengthen the phobia of the objective audience and it s oftentimes needed in this form of concern (even however there are horror movies the place the protagonist wins in the top besides, like Friday the thirteenth as an occasion). This does ensue in different eventualities besides however. inspite of the undeniable fact that, quite some the time whilst some thing like this occurs, it s relatively the antagonist who replaced right into a protagonist or a redeemed villain, this occurs plenty with anti-heroes besides reckoning on how undesirable their acts could be to evaluate them an antagonist and a protagonist. there has been situations the place the villain wins in the top, yet often this makes way for different movies the place the hero manages to get his vengeance. yet on occasion this doesn t ensue... and there may be the occasional ending to a narrative the place the villain outright defeats the hero..... --- ideal now i'm writing a narrative some guy who's investigating the case of an strange infants s television television practice he used to exhibit screen as a newborn which relatively has a plenty darker edge to it, the place infants who have been in the practice have been relatively abducted and killed and the killer who replaced into working the television channel makes a comeback. If the hero in that tale have been to lose in the top, i think of that the implications could be that the two he in no way found out a suspect, or he could have been murdered. i'm questioning that an ending to that tale might the two be that the suspect could be unseen in the time of quite some the story and actually manages to harm out with it, without his call or the different substantial suggestions given. the different ending might that the killer had relatively died it sluggish in the past and a variety of of different of the infants that have been concept to have been killed had relatively survived and escaped.
2016-10-17 15:48:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry but it's not up to you to interfere. The couple might still love each other but I don't agree with being together for the sake of a child, often it does more a lot damage than good. Their son is probably going through the dreaded teenage years. He'd probably still be acting madly if they were together.
2006-12-03 04:21:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadly, just because their son would like them to be together, it isn't a good enough reason to get "married" again.
Getting married for the sole purpose of making your children happy is unfair for everyone involved. It rarely "works" and only makes people "resentful" in the end.
Sometimes the best thing people can do for their children is get divorced and stay that way. Maybe that's the reason they still "love each other and get along"!
2006-12-03 04:38:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am concerned with people that divorce and remarry unless they are older ! And 40 is good! But they still can have the same probs as why they divorced before.So I wouldnt push marriage over the son!
2006-12-03 04:23:36 · answer #5 · answered by jessy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't make anyone love or marry, they divorced for reasons, and those reasons likely haven't changed. I suspect their son was spoiled by either or both of them out of guilt for the divorce and he needs his butt kicked back into reality.
If he wants to act madly...then some judge or inmate in jail will straighten him out in a rude awakening.
2006-12-03 04:23:29 · answer #6 · answered by OleMarbleEyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the end it's not about being married. I know families who were never married but loved each other, and their kids were fine.
How is marriage going to fix their son's problem? It's not.
You can't force anyone to marry. If they love each other, they shouldn't be required to marry. Their son is 16, not 6. He should be old enough to figure out how to solve his own problems.
2006-12-03 04:20:45 · answer #7 · answered by FaZizzle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People can't marry or remarry for someone else - even their son. Stay out of it. 10 yrs old is old enough to learn that life doesn't always turn out the way you want it to.
2006-12-03 04:49:48 · answer #8 · answered by Beth T 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That decision can only be their's dear.
Having them get remarried isn't going to stop a 16 yr. old from acting out. He's probably doing drugs and drinking.
2006-12-03 04:20:26 · answer #9 · answered by peggin_beast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's bad news, the problem with divorce is that is legalized child abuse. when people break up they can't go back together. the resentment is still there. nothing has changed too bad for the family especially the 16 year young.
2006-12-03 04:25:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋