You can never be in equivalence to whatever you could never represent as part, whole, equivalence, difference, bound, tie, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.
2006-12-02 17:28:24 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I am so sorry. I just can not understand the statement. Perhaps you could post where it originated so we may see it in context.
Thank you.
2006-12-02 17:37:46 · answer #1 · answered by roscoedeadbeat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because it is misconstrued. I answered your other question in kindness, now I'd love to hear how you come to a conclusion. I can appreciate what it is you're trying to do but unfortunately not everyone understands these types of concepts- it's extremely deep and frankly not practical or relevant to some individuals.
2006-12-03 02:37:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand the statement. May I suggest a re-post with simpler wordage?
2006-12-03 01:59:44 · answer #3 · answered by Subconsciousless 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In fact, you could. Human beings present all those characteristics. That's why the world is so complex.
2006-12-03 03:18:52 · answer #4 · answered by Tune 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I agree that your question is only a piece of a puzzle!
2006-12-03 01:53:54 · answer #5 · answered by JNISSI 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,I don't agree with it.
You shuld write it clearly,not by copying only
2006-12-03 01:43:17 · answer #6 · answered by Sakib 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
â
What does my ability to represent have anything to do with the fact of my identity?
2006-12-03 01:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by -.- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
beats me
2006-12-03 02:25:31 · answer #8 · answered by Pinstripequeen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well,
it did started out to be a good question...........?
2006-12-03 02:04:28 · answer #9 · answered by rrainn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋