English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We know human mating and childrearing systems are constantly adjusting to levels of technology, population density, deployment of males and females in production and local enviromental conditions. For example where there is an abundance of land and a shortage of labor polygomy prevails so that men can become properous by adding additional wives and children ( Utah last century). At the opposite extreme polyandry represents an adjustment to scarcity of agricultural resources, 2 or 3 brothers may share one wife to cut down on heirs to the land (Tibet). Monogomy tends to fit in between the two and of course we have simple promiscuity with high divorce rates in the west today. I guess cultural may play as large a role as economics in all this, but I'm not sure. I don't think it is human nature to be exclusively promiscuous, polyandrous or polygynous. What do you think?

2006-12-02 17:16:01 · 6 answers · asked by wanda gag 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

6 answers

wanda, your qn is expertly put. but all that is already thoroly reasearched and studied by anthropos, psychos, socios, economs.and medicos like havelok ellis. and conitinuously updated . simple answer is one to one. but if there are 10 singles in the locale, then how?adultery fornication incest prostituition. naturally.Lots daughters. Jacobs son. Solomons 2000 harem with 10,000 men preying on them;plus the queen sheba.
There are tribes/cultures practicing polyandry in india without any any any sort of fuss like in the western mind.

2006-12-02 18:12:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1

2006-12-03 09:51:30 · answer #2 · answered by Trini-HaitianGrl81 5 · 0 0

Natural of course is one at a time. However, all humans are animals, therefore some will allow the excuse of "animal instinct" to become their cultural basis of immorality and lack of control.

2006-12-02 17:35:00 · answer #3 · answered by nicsmom1999 2 · 0 0

In each species there's a behavioral selection. i've got heard of learn that teach a undeniable proportion of eggs fertilized by making use of a male who replaced into not the mate of the birds under learn. that is been see you later I forgot the %, the chicken species and no count if or not that they had seasonal or lifetime associates. In rather much each species 2 conflicting "regulations" are at artwork. one million) Sperm is affordable. 2) Offspring who get parental care have larger survival expenses. to describe. affordable sperm potential that a philandering male who spend his time seducing different men's better halves might trick them into looking after his offspring. besides the fact that if he leaves a path of unmarried moms and a remarkable style of of the moms and young ones die of starvation with out his care, he nonetheless might have sufficient offspring survive to pass on his cheating genes. that is going to be evident that young ones who're cared for by making use of the two mothers and fathers have an greater possibility of survival that young ones who do not. the female in this style of union constantly has cares for her own new child. So she is often going to pass on her being concerned genes. besides the fact that, women can cheat too. for this reason they pass on their own cheating genes, to boot because of the fact the cheating male. The being concerned male is out of superb fortune and out of the gene pool. some cheating females will pass on a guy whilst he's unmarried and take a investigate to seduce him whilst he marries. curiously they ask your self if his spouse observed some thing they did not and that they get the urge to ascertain it out. (and sure, i've got exceeded over adoption. There are not any genes of the adoptive discern exceeded on, so it does not precisely artwork like this). Age is likewise a factor. some "Wild" human beings calm down later in life. some truthful spouses get the "7 3 hundred and sixty 5 days itch". So the "organic" reaction for our species is that some prefer to mate for all times and a few do not. The "unnatural" section is that by making use of encouraging or imposing that all of us mate for all times, can tension human beings into kinfolk with the incorrect human beings. How do you recognize that your fiance isn't basically marrying you because of the fact society forced them into it?

2016-12-18 06:36:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think you already know the answer. If there were a "natural" number of human mates, their wouldn't be wild variation and deviation from it. We have asex drive, that's it, the rest is up to you and your culture.

2006-12-04 03:50:09 · answer #5 · answered by Always 1 · 0 0

one!!!

2006-12-02 17:33:31 · answer #6 · answered by Consuming Fire 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers