Do you think George W. Bush had anything to do with 9/11?

Question

some people feel he is just finishing what his dad started, or is mad at iraq for defeting his father, and there seems to be many odd coincidences that link bush and 9/11. Please dont post if ur just gonna ramble on about how I should respect our president and thank god I have the freedoms I have, cuz I dont care and it will only make me laugh at how ignorant you are.

i dont know, and im not saying how I feel, im just seeing what people reactions are to things I've heard and seen.

no im not bashing any1. and as for the ignorance comment, im saying people are ignorant to get mad and rant to me saying that im an idiot when I dont beleive this stuff, im just trying to see if some people do.

Answer 1

I appreciate your bravery in asking this question.

"All truth passes in three stages. First it is ridiculed. Second it is violently opposed. Third it is accepted as self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
- Albert Einstein

It is to be expected that you will see two of the following responses to your question:

A - those who will use the weak "straw man" attack. That is, they will weave and distort your inquiries with things like Big Foot or UFO's and then poke fun of you. It simply reflects their inability to address the facts of the argument.

B - those who will use the ad-hominem attacks. That is, they don't even know who you are. You can be an accredited scientist, a military insider, a first responder to 9/11 and yet they will neglect your knowledge of the subject and brand you as a "conspiracy nut," and accuse you of wasting taxpayers' time.

These people may not be aware of it, but they demonstrate a dangerous form of ignorance. It threatens our way of life. The naysayers and the viscious, fact-deprived attack dogs will accuse 9/11 truth seekers as conspiracy theorists.

The fact is, the 9/11 Truth movement favors a scientific theory and not the political theory which is what the 9/11 Commission finally produced for the American people. In response to your questions about Bush's possible involvement with the attacks, consider the following:


1. Many are still surprised to find that not two, but three skyscrapers collapsed on 9/11. World Trade Center 7 was a 47 story steel framed building that was not hit by a plane. We are told it collapsed from fire. No building has ever collapsed from fire alone in the history of architecture. It fell at free-fall speed in about 6 seconds. Neither Bush, nor the 9/11 Commission ever fully addressed this.

2. The collapse of the towers came down at near free-fall speed. The Twin Towers collapsed between 10 and 11 seconds. For this to have happened from all the towers is no different than dropping a rock from the roof top. In other words, there was no resitance from the floors below which were intact and not on fire. Fire and structural failure alone cannot explain this.

3. The floors above the impact zone on the towers exploded in mid-air. There is ample video evidence that shows this. Much of the concrete was pulverized in pyroclastic fasion before it reached the ground.

4. What explains the "squibs" or outward mini-explosions in the floors below the collapsing floors as they came down? Some say pressure went downward within the building. This would defy physics. For this to be accepted, there had to have been no resistance from the floors below the impact zone. Furthemore, if this indeed was pressure built up from above, why does it exit from only a few windows? The theory that hijacked planes, fire, structural failure caused each of the three collapsea is an unlikely conspiracy whereas controlled demolition, a scientific theory, easily explains theses anomalies.

5. Firefighters and steel workers reported seeing pools of molten metal under the rubble and beams that had vaporized steel at the edges weeks after the collapses. These pits were surely deprived of oxygen. Can jet fuel produce this kind of heat? Deductive reasoning will rule out jet fuel as the cause for these anomalies. One thing that can explain it is the use of thermite or thermate, an explosive material used in controlled demolitions. It can burn with very little oxygen and over long periods of time.

6. Steel beams can be seen shooting up to 300 feet from the tower in an outward descent. Physics requires the projection of these heavy beams to have been caused by an energy greater than jet-fuel fires and gravity. Explosions, however, can explain this outward thrust.

7. Almost all of the steel was shipped to Asia as scrap. This was authroized before the investiation even was started. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics. It is also a federal crime. No one was charged for this crime.

8. There are hundreds of televised reports as well as written reports from FDNY, NYPD, newsreporters, and civilians who claim to have heard explosions in the moments prior to each of the collapses. This was greatly ignored by the 9/11 Commission.

9. Samples of the steel that escaped shipment to Asia were analyzed by Dr. Steven Jones, an accredited scientist from Bringham Young University concluded that the steel was essentialy vaporized and that chemical residues on the remanats showed evidence of thermate, a material used specifically in controlled demolitions. His findings are not consistent with the conspiracy theory that the towers collpased from fire alone. I should also add that he is a Mormon, and hardly a liberal.

10. There is written documentation from Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc., who indicated that there were extensive power outages in the WTC in the days leading up to the 9/11 attacks and that bomb-sniffing dogs were removed from the buildings. His letter, which would be considered evidcence by investigative standards, never was mentioned by the 9/11 Commission.

11. George Bush took 411 days to even begin an investigation into 9/11 and address the questions above. This is a shocking contrast to the 7 days it took for us to investigate the JFK assassination, or the 6 days to investigate the Titanic, or the 9 days it took to investigate Pearl Harbor. Why did it take so long? Furthermore, he agreed to an investiagtion on the grounds that he would not be called to testify under oath publically and he was to be questioned only in private while holding hands with Dick Cheney. This can be looked up. It can't be refuted. You can infer that Bush was opposed to getting to the truth of 9/11. His actions and odd behavior indicate he has something to hide. But no one of authority has addressed this openly.

Remember - no one has been fired as a result of 9/11.

If anyone should accuse you of being anti-American, crazy, conspiratorally nuts, or a Bush-hater, then demand them to suck on this:

A scientific poll from the Wall Street Journal/CBS news found that 53% of Americans feel the Bush Administration is hiding facts about 9/11. Another 28% feel that Bush and Co. is lying about it.

Are 83% of Americans "conspiracy nuts?"

With the irrefutable facts from above, even if you would casually consider 25% of what I wrote to be worth investigating, then you would support the re-opening of 9/11. The facts are as follows - The cost to investigate the shuttle disaster was over $30 million. The cost to investigate Clinton was $42 million. The total governent spending on the greatest defense failure in our country's history was barely $16 million.

Deductive reasoning and logic tells us the government did not investigate this crime as best as they could. What was produced, one fire marshall disimissed as a "half-baked farce." Furthermore, the facts that the investigation omitted the issues and evidence mentioned above gives cause for alarm. If there are individuals out there who were complicit in the attacks besides the 19 hijackers, wouldn't you want them to be brought to justice?

If you favor the scientific method, the answer this question is yes. If you favor the political method, then you would say no.

Our forefathers intended us to question our government as they did which brought upon our own revolution and the birth of America. We owe it to them to continue this tradition of unconditional scrutiny.

We also owe it to the men and women who died that day, and to the first responders who continue to die from respiratory ailments connected to Ground Zero. They, have been lied to as well. The EPA gave everyone the thumbs up to go clean up the mess and search for bodies. The evidence that the air was letahally toxic was ignored. This is criminal. Research this and you will find how the government has turned its back on the heroes from that day. They have abandoned standard autopsy procedures because they don't want the deaths of these rescue workers to be "misinterpreted." This shows a contempt for the facts and a cover-up of the truth. Dismiss this and ask yourself how American you really are.

9/11 Truth is not anti-American. In fact, it is about defending America from ignorance, deceit, and enemies within our country. 9/11 Truth upholds all values and beliefs found and protected within the Constitution. To deny us this makes you no different than those who deny the Holocaust.

We cannot be stopped. Truth always finds a way. Bush can't stop this from happening.

Peace and God bless.

Answer 2

There was thermite residue found within the rubble of the twin towers (a chemical used for remote detonations), the twin towers were built to withstand a plane crash and yet somehow they crumbled, if you look at any video of the collapse you will see it not only collapses like a remote detonation but you will also notice small light flashes via detonators exploding within the building. Cheney ordered simulations made on the scenario that the twin towers were to be hit by 747s only days before the strike. Close relatives to Osama bin Laden were given National Guard escorts out of the country hours before. Bush claimed to have seen the attack on television hours before it actually happened, and in reality he was reading to children in a grade school in order to boost people's views of him.

Ignorance is shown most when one can not be swayed from an opinion which has been proven wrong over and over; the attack on the twin towers was not an extremist muslim suicide attack, it was a move towards leading America into war.

Answer 3

G W Bush isn't finishing what his dad started. GWBUSH, as with ALL Republicans, has found a way to 1.) Make lots of money 2.) Hide behind a false righteousness to accomplish his wicked goals.

G W Bush is the most Anti-American President that has ever served. He is incapable of even accomplishing the Satanic goals he has set out to accomplish.

As far as 911..I dont know. But let me say this: This man has not the slightest reservation about sending Young men into harms way..And doesn't mind getting them killed to accomplish his dark little plans. IF he DID have something to do with 911, it would not surprise me.

Answer 4

I do not believe he had anything to do with it. I am not ranting, but I do respect our President. Anybody can make a claim, however people have been doing that since John F. Kennedy's death, and the moon landings. Doesn't make them true.

You may call me ignorant. However, I don't really care what you think. Why don't you get off your teenager soapbox, and quit bashing people who are trying to do the best they can.

Answer 5

Oh, really now. That's a pretty elaborate plan to have advocated in the short 9 months that he was in office.

You really give him alot of credit. I agree that he is a brilliant man, but I am not sure that he could have advocated and planned something as strategic as this in that amount of time.

The terrorrists were in our country for longer than his term training for their "Day of glory".

How long do you think it takes to train to become an airline pilot anyway? How many slurrpies did we unknowingly buy from them while they were in training?

This subject is getting old.

Answer 6

No I don't.

And Iraq didn't "defeat" his father.

There was an assination plot against Bush sr that Saddam was going to try to have it done

Answer 7

Everything to do with it, based on the proof that I see.

Answer 8

the episode of South Park called Mystery of the Urinal Duece, explains everything.

Answer 9

George Bush wasn't responsible fore planning and executing the actuall attack but I believe he is at fault for provoking the attack. Also, everyone knows he is a war monger and the attack has provided an excuse for him to go to war.

Answer 10

Your question makes me laugh at your ignorance, and lack of intelligence !!

Answer 11

No. He was reading "My Pet Goat" at the time.