Because my momma always told me not to hit unless you were hit first
Department of Defence of Department of Offence?
And for those who are going to contribute 911 to iraq, the majority were Saudies.
2006-12-02 15:56:39 · 10 answers · asked by rehcueguy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hasn't the middle east been fighting for 1000's of years.
2006-12-02 16:18:33 · update #1
Operation Steal Iraq's Oil After We Rule Afghanistan! This was the original name. Or Operation Saudi Princes Are Sunni So We Have To Do What They Say.
2006-12-02 16:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is Operation Iraqi Freedom, Enduring Freedom applies to Afganistan. 9-11 was attributed to the HiJackers - mostly Saudi Arabian nationals. The Offensive in Afganistan was a retaliatory response to the events of 9-11. Iraq was based on old information from defectors re: "wmd", mobile labs, etc., and there have been missles equipped with nuclear or radioactive payload capacity, which was a direct violation of multiple UN sanctions and treaties. The Dictator Sadaam, had launched radioactive, seron/mustard gases on Iraqi citizens. This was a horrible man that deserves to be tortured by the families of all those he tortured in acid baths, shot in the streets, beat , severed limbs, gouged out eyes, let his sons rape and sodomize, etc. etc. etc., and when push came to shove, where was this almighty leader, "In a Spider Hole, on his belly," like the yellow bellied coward that he is.
Lastly, BLAME for the current state of instability - unrest - quote being on the verge of "civil war" should be placed squarely on the shoulders of the insurgents & religious zeaouts NOT our soldiers. ****the radical's shoulders - not our soldiers.
2006-12-02 16:22:39 · answer #2 · answered by rjsluvbug 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all Enduring freedom was in AFGHANISTAN NOT IRAQ
IRAQ IS OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM PLEASE GET THIS RIGHT BE4 U BASH THE US MILITARY
second bush nknew 9/11 had nothing to do with iraq
Third stop trying to be funny by saying department of offence
4th we thought they had weps of mass destruction they had scuds which can carry nukes so id count the scud as a wmd
5th were not gonna attack saudi arabia cuz there an ALLY not a dictatoring scud launchin, saudi, kurd, shite, israeli, killin country like iraq
2006-12-02 16:04:39 · answer #3 · answered by Army__Strong 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your momma was wrong. If their is a good chance that some crazy dude is going to knock you out hitting them first is the right thing to do. Sometimes a good defense is a good offense. If Saddam was still in power do you think he would still be looking to get an effective WMD or would he have them by now. Don't try to tell me he wasn't trying to get them or that Al-quada didn't have a presents in Iraq prior to 911.
2006-12-02 16:21:22 · answer #4 · answered by GJfromfla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Operation Let's Stop Arguing About It And Agree To Unf**k the Situation.
2006-12-02 15:59:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or better yet "Let's Start a Civil War and Blame It On The People Who Are Being Killed"
Signed G.W.Bush
2006-12-02 16:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The USA for some reason needed a war so it was operation attack.
It was and is the department of offense.
2006-12-02 16:00:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its DefenSe and OffenSe.
And it's ATTRIBUTE, not contribute.
Maybe momma should have taught you spelling and vocabulary.
It doesn't matter how people answer this. You already have your mind made up by the tone of your question.
2006-12-02 16:00:22 · answer #8 · answered by go_uva 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh yeah, those people are free...to be blown up in an open-air market by their own countrymen.
2006-12-02 15:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your right on .
2006-12-02 16:01:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋