I answer this question with caution, since I had given my opinion to a question earlier regarding USC, and I think that Yahoo is a USC fan.
No one gave Michigan a chance against ND, then they went in to South Bend and totally dominated them, up and down the field, the WHOLE game.
ND went to USC an underdog. Very few, (if any) experts gave ND a chance to win, so their loss wasn't a surprise to anyone who knows anything about college football......Even ND fans!!
Which makes Michigan's an even bigger win than USC's.
In my totally biased opinion, I think that Ohio State and Michigan should be playing for the national title.
You may say, 'Michigan had thier shot and lost, why should they play again, they already played?' I say that the two best teams in the country should play for the national title every year, and Ohio State and Michigan are CLEARLY the two best teams in the country this year, regardless of their BCS rankings.
Auburn has lost, twice...at home......Florida lost to Auburn and had more than a few unimpressive wins against MUCH lesser competition...( Geogia, Vanderbilt, South Carolina and Florida State.)
ND lost B I G to Michigan 47 - 21.....in South Bend and BIG to USC 44 - 24.....AT USC.
Bottom line......Michigan lost to Ohio State, who has been # 1 all year (including the preseason)........AT OSU, by 3 points.
USC lost to Oregon State ( who hasn't been ranked at all this year, in any poll, even after they beat USC ), and UCLA (also unranked) ......if that doesn't merit a OSU - UM rematch ( on a neutral field ), then you are a fan whose team is trying to get into the national title game, or, you just don't want to see the best two teams play for the national title.
I won't fault anyone, ever, for being a fan of their team, I never have. If you have a favorite team you should defend them, always, but, if your team isn't one of the two best teams in the country, then you should be happy that the two best teams in the country are playing for the national title.....
PLEASE, don't root (or RANK) against a team just because you don't like them. As fan of college football you should always want to see the two best teams in the country play for the national title, each, and every year. That is what the BCS was created for, to end the arguing amongst all fans throughout the country, and crown a true national champion.
At the end of it all, USC's or Michigan's worst scenario is playing in the Rose Bowl, perhaps against each other, which, in my opinion the greatest of all bowls (also it was the first ever bowl game....Jan. 1,1902 Michigan 49 - Stanford 0)
So I'm not complaining that Michigan might not make the BCS NC game, I'm saying, simply, that the two best teams in the country should play for the national title........every year.
2006-12-02 23:49:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave C 5
·
1⤊
0⤋