English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-02 14:06:51 · 9 answers · asked by JESSE A 1 in Health Men's Health

9 answers

Men who have not been circumcised appear to have a higher incidence of penile cancer. That said, penile cancer (even among uncircumcised men) only accounts for about 1% of all cancers among men. Men who are uncircumcised should be diligent about cleaning under the foreskin to avoid the buildup of smegma, which can breed bacteria. There is no difference in sexual function between circumcised and uncircumcised men.

2006-12-02 16:12:05 · answer #1 · answered by RaeRae 4 · 2 0

YES, most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the unhooded penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.

There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an intact foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.

Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.

As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

2006-12-06 17:08:17 · answer #2 · answered by popibz 2 · 0 0

Yes it matters... keep reading...

CIRCUMCISION IS VERY BENEFICIAL, its cleaner and several research bodies have concluded that circumcised men have less risk of contracting STD's such as AIDS-HIV or herpes.

Uncircumcised penises are difficult to keep clean, and more prone to infections and penile cancer, studies have shown.
A circumcised penis is naturally clean and virtually free from urinary infection. You will not have to worry again with careful washing of your penis.

Is it NOT true that the AAP (American Academy of Paediatrics) does not recommend circumcision. They simply say they leave the decision to parents. But recently, and specially after the New Zealand study, the AAP has been discussing if it may be necessary to change their policy and recommend circumcision to all newborns as they used to do, so in the future we may see that the AAP advocates again circumcision.
Have a look at: http://www.baby-health.net/articles/381.html

About STD's:

As I said, several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up to seven times less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://icuxbridge.icnetwork.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=14095142&method=full&siteid=53340&headline=-circumcision-protects-against-aids--name_page.html

As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html

About sensitivity of a circumcised penis:

No medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.
Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.

Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African and South American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates

2006-12-03 08:40:56 · answer #3 · answered by Scuba 3 · 1 0

Matter to who? It depends on how u feel about yourself.

Cut men ar more hygienic to be with. It is well known that the foreskin is a harvest place for a lot of the organisms that cause STDs. Thats why un-cut men's penises smell more. Its true.

If u have the option I think u should go for it.

2006-12-03 06:18:27 · answer #4 · answered by Lara D 4 · 2 0

it is rare to matter, but if it does matter, it is those who have not been circumcised. those who have not been circumcised, are prone to infection due to bacteria building up in the "extrat" skin, and lack of washing in that area.

2006-12-02 22:13:15 · answer #5 · answered by trust2400 3 · 2 0

no it doesn't, but the one not circumcised must be extra careful, because they can contract dieases and infections more

2006-12-02 22:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by cuddle me softly as soft as can get 2 · 1 0

If you have not, it just means you need to take a little more care in hygiene.

2006-12-02 22:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 2 0

You can be a Christian either way.

2006-12-02 22:15:44 · answer #8 · answered by Lovin' Mary's Lamb 4 · 0 1

no i dont think so. just make sure you wash really well

2006-12-02 22:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by eliza_12y 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers