English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You may say it is giving victory to the terrorists. Not many people know that a ton of governments have negotiated with terrorists in history behind the scenes, but the won't publicy state that. But you know what? I think, like a lot of people, that we are heading towards the End of The World. I know it sounds paranoind, but look in the Middle East. Crazy Iranian leader is building nuclear warheads to fire at Israel and North Korea is already possesing powerful weapons that could be used against the US, and we are screwed in Iraq. I see an imminent nuclear war, and so do many people, and not just paranoids or psychics. If the Middle East had a Palestinian State, what would they be fighting for? What is to lose by creating a Palestinian State? I would still support Israel, but I would attempt to work with leaders around the world to create a Palestinian State. Hey, conditions wouldn't get any worse. Please just state why I'm wrong or right and don't be rude. This is what I believe.

2006-12-02 13:12:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

if we negotiated with them, and we are still where we are todya, it only illustrates it doesnt work.

2006-12-02 13:16:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

OK, so, not trying to come off as some sort of religious fanatic, but when's the last time you picked up the Qu'ran? You should read chapter nine. It tells quite specifically about the islamists and how they feel and what they should do with Christians and Jews. And guess what. If you're not one of them, then you MUST be an infidel...
I'm not a Catholic, but several months ago, the Pope addressed a group in Germany. He read an excerpt passage from a book written by a Byzentine Prince in the 14th century. Do you recall? In a nutshell, it said that the only thing islam offers the world is hatred and violence. And what was the reaction from the islamics around the world? They threatened to blow up the Vatican. I think they proved the Byzentine Prince's point...
I don't see Iraq as being a mistake or a lost cause. People get all too emotional and listen too much to the spin doctor in Washington, and then all rason and logic goes right out the window. Do you recall why we went back to Iraq? Really? Could it have been that the U.N. sanctioned cease fire agreement was not being kept? That perhaps the U.N.'s Food For Oil Program was a joke in that the French, Germans and Russians were all taking bribes from Saddam? And the U.S. tried repeatedly to get the U.N. to uphold the agreement? Hmmmm... They wouldn't though. Why is that you suppose? Maybe because they were too busy getting rich illegally and they knew the U.S. has been playing the world's police force for the last fifteen to twenty years... The U.S. will take care of it. So, what about what's going on there now? The "President" of Iran announced the other day that the U.S. is destabilizing the region... REALLY? And all of these "Insurgents" (read terrorists), they're coming from where? Iran and Syria? Hmmmm. So, WHO is destabilizing the region?
Does it not concern you that our last "President" was busy smoking "Monica stained" cigars in the rose garden with a world renouned, terrorist? Or that the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq and the "President" of Iran, both commended the people of America for having voted in the democrats in this last election?
War. In WW I, the average monthly death toll was 98,000 men. And that went on for how many years? In WW II, immediately after the D-Day landings, Gen. Patton landed on the beach in France and began a drive across France. He lost on average 1,000 men a week. So, when WW II ended, how long did we stay in Japan and Germany? And the Korean War? How long did we stay in Korea? Folks, we're still there. Trouble is, the American people have grown soft in the belly and soft in the head. They have no spine. They've forgotten all of history's lessons. You CANNOT negotiate with madmen. England's Chamberlain tried. He gave Hitler the Sudatenland -- and it wasn't even his to give. On the promise that there would be peace. Go figure. So, you give the palestinians land? From where did the "palestinian" people come prior to the six day war? The liberal news always referred to the Gaza Strip as "The Occupied Territory." So, does that mean we should refer to Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California as "The Occupied Territories?" Prior to the six day war, those people were all Eyptian and Syrian. So, why doesn't Egypt or Syria repatriate their people? They, like us, are poltical pawns. You listen to the lies long enough, you begin to believe them. So, you give them their own state. What would they then fight for? I refer you back to chapter nine of the Qu'ran.
If we were to pull out of Iraq now, it REALLY would be just like Vietnam all over again. The deaths would all be meaningless, the shakey government would quickly fall and the Terrorists would would take over. The next target would be the U.S.. And they will not stop until we succome. Be it through economics -- they'd control the oil, or barbarous acts against U.S. citizens, they'll come for us. No, the answer is simple, divide Iraq into three separate states, the Kurds in the North, The Sunnis in the middle and the Shiites in the South. Secure the border and deal with Syria and Iran aggressively to insure a long lasting peace and tranquility throughout the world forever more. And send the damned bill to the U.N..

2006-12-02 21:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by Doc 7 · 0 1

Do you agree with my plan?

Bomb the ************* Zionist state till 99% of the whoresons and bitches are dead. Leave the place as it is till their bodies get decomposed for atleast ten days. On the eleventh day order the 1% to dump them in furnaces till they burn to ashes. Establish a Palestinian state and let the world stay in peace.

2006-12-05 19:01:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

After the Palastinian State they'd still claim to be cheated and demand more land from Israel.

2006-12-02 21:17:48 · answer #4 · answered by robert m 7 · 1 1

Your'e right ...not being rude.
I'm agree.

2006-12-02 21:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by . 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers