http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120101509.html
2006-12-02 12:28:19 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No one pays attention to them!!
2006-12-02 12:34:21 · answer #1 · answered by SICKO 2 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, by far Bush is the worst Presidant I have ever witnessed or any democracy in the history of the world has witnessed. At least with Clinton you had a Evil Genious. Here, you have a stupid Demonic puppet for the corporate dollar. At least his father knew how to handle diplomacy. Bush the younger ... diplomacy? Please don't make me laugh. Impeachment is too good for Bush, in my opinion he should burn on the stake for the mass slaughter and rape of thousands of innocents. He has stolen and then shat upon the American legacy. It will take 100 years of American Integrity to rid this stain of hell from our record. There, was that clear enough for you? If you want, just do the research but I would not listen to fox for unbiased new, that is the reason Republicans tend to be so stupid in the first place.
2006-12-02 12:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by NoFear OnlyUnderstanding 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What difference does it make? The Washington Post is not the only journalistic voice in America. That paper won't write history books. That paper doesn't influence anybody.,
2006-12-02 12:34:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
YEAH, The Washington Freakin' Post and the New York Freakin' Times. Two of the absolute worst loony leftie newspapers in the history of this country and geniuses quote their buttplug loony leftie writers like their regurgitations and outright lies are knowledge handed down from Olympus.
Here's a clue; CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED AND HAD HIS LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW TAKEN AWAY FROM HIM FOR LYING TO A GRAND JURY. And a genius like you wants to say that President Bush is the worst. You're just goofy.
2006-12-02 12:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, because it's the truth.
Ah ha #6, the only reason you think Clinton was the worst was because he actually had the country moving in the right direction and the sex scandal that he at first lied about and then told the truth. Guess what? No one died when Clinton lied. Unfortunately, people fighting in the army over in Iraq died when Bush lied.
2006-12-02 12:36:19 · answer #5 · answered by iwannarevolt 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No, Carter will always historically be the worst, weakest president and Clinton will probably go down as the most corrupt.
2006-12-02 12:42:50 · answer #6 · answered by dasuberding 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Technically yes because in America you have the freedom of speech. But then again I think Clinton was the worst president.
2006-12-02 12:31:01 · answer #7 · answered by nikky 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Seems fair to me, and I agree with them.
2006-12-02 15:06:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fair ???
It is journalism not the Special Olympics. It does not have to be fair.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-02 12:32:31 · answer #9 · answered by 43 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. He has done a terrible job in the war on terror, but I can't honestly say he is worse than say Jimmy Carter, or Herbert Hoover, or even Woodrow Wilson.
2006-12-02 12:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by billy d 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Wow! A liberal newspaper, putting Bush down. Now that is real news isn't it?
2006-12-02 12:36:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋