I mean, come on, how can you not feel that you private part is uncovered. She had to know that she didnt have paties on her. Its sad that even being a mom does not bring out a decent woman out of her. Such a whore...
2006-12-02 12:08:06 · 19 answers · asked by Honest&True 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
1) The camera man should have had enough decency not to have taken the photo.
2) She knows she is being followed all the time and has had alot of bad press lately because of her inexperience as a parent.
3) If she loves her kids and wants what is best for them she will make sure that she has nothing but the best possible exposure she can get to show the world and the courts that she is fit to be a parent and to have full custody of her boys, not be out all the time with Paris and Lindsey who are not exactly the best people to be associated with.
4) WHERE is her mother! Shouldn't she be trying to help her daughter out by being a good role model for her and telling her she is not showing a good light on herself since she announced she was divorcing that sorry loser.
5) WHERE is her attorney! Shouldn't he/she be informing her how she should be acting if she wants to keep her kids.Dcfs is probably keeping a close eye on her.
6) Grow up Britney and be a good mom and role model for your kids.
7) This has been bugging me since she had Sean and the whole world has gone crazy about her parenting skills. If I had the whole world watching my every move, I sure would not be out showing my p*ssy in public every other day. She knew it was out there! I mean come on, didn't she feel a breeze.
2006-12-02 12:33:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It was for publicity. People like Spears and Hilton know that whenever they leave the house they will be swarmed by paparazzi and have their pictures taken constantly. So she knew exactly what she was doing. With an upcoming divorce and custody battle these kind of sleazy antics show an unbelievable lack of brains on Britney's part. I know she's a media whore but, come on, this is ridiculous.
2006-12-02 16:06:39 · answer #2 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't you mean intention to get more attention? It was actually unintended since she was actually climbing out of her friend's car and a member of the stalkerazzi practically stood in front of her. If she wanted to do it for attention, then she would've raised her skirt. She probably didn't want to wear panties, which was her choice.
It makes me sick when people judge her based solely on the fact that she wasn't wearing underwear. That was her choice and it doesn't mean she's an indecent woman. It ticks me off when she gets called a whore just because she doesn't dress a certain way nor act a certain way to please someone.
2006-12-02 14:59:06 · answer #3 · answered by iwannarevolt 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, it would be a lot easier not to humilate herself by flirting or being seen with someone famous in public kissing, etc. That would be a lot easier and more effective. Theres some girls that wear no panties, shes normal and can ahev that preference, However, she should know how to get out of a car as a lady would and realize the cameras are going to be on her and expect it and be prepared especially being a mother now.
2006-12-02 12:14:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I really think it was not her intention for her private part to be shown. From the picture that I have seen(thank God they had a decal to cover it), she looked like she was stoned and I feel she forgot she didn't have any on. It was so nasty and she has enough money to look sexy but yet classy at the same time. She showed me that she really needs to grow up and should have did all that partying before having children.
2006-12-02 12:16:39 · answer #5 · answered by Ignorant people and I dont mix:) 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think she doin it for either reasons. Now that she is Paris Hilton's best friend, she is probably tryin to be like her because im pretty sure that everyone knows that Paris is famous for showin her genatal area. Nicole Richie was also Paris's BFF, but you didn't she her hopping out of a limo with her crotch out. So I do believe that Britney is doing that just to be a monkey. You know what they say ~Monkey See, Monkey Do~
2006-12-02 12:16:31 · answer #6 · answered by Wimpyyy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Undies/no undies, whatever. The fact of the matter if cameras were following you 24 hours a day always clicking chances are they might catch some pretty embarrassing photos of all of us.
2006-12-02 12:16:00 · answer #7 · answered by Skanky McSkankypants 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dunno...she looked kind of wasted to me. If your not gonna wear panites in public...and ya got cameras in your face constantly (or pointed wherever)
ya gotta be more careful. if your gonna run with bimbo's...your gonna end up a bimbo! I don't care who you are...how much money you got...or how famous you are....that was a nasty photograph. I'm glad her kids are little and won't have to live through all the ridicule of their mom's "snatch" all over the internet.
2006-12-02 12:25:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe that cameraman shouldn't have aimed his camera up her skirt, then we'd never know! It's her coochi, and her business...
2006-12-02 12:17:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think she was just making Kevin see what he's missing and hope he gets jealous.
2006-12-02 12:31:30 · answer #10 · answered by countrykarebare 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋