Finally someone has confronted this awful lie.
2006-12-02 12:01:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because I feel less without my Two in my life.
2006-12-02 20:01:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by S K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Numerically speaking yes, but one is also first place, so much more than two, being second.
2006-12-02 20:02:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by salstick 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes because one comes before two
2006-12-02 20:00:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anita 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
One pair could equal Two
2006-12-02 20:00:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because two has twice as much one than one does.
2006-12-02 20:00:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by daniel.foster 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, One will always be as valuable as any other two. That's basic selfsteem.
=0)
Good luck
2006-12-02 22:42:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes, the amount of two reveals a greater value then one.
2006-12-02 20:00:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by luckyplaya23 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
it is true from a mathematical perspective, but the inverse could be true from a minimalist perspective (less is more)
2006-12-02 20:01:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
heh heh have you been havin a drink tonight by any chance?
we all need a bit of silliness every now and again so i dont see any harm in this question
2006-12-02 20:02:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋