Holocaust vs Rwanda? both Genocide?

Question

Should the genocide in Rwanda be stopped ......what do you think? Millions died in the Holocaust but it came to an end should the end come to the genocide in Rwanda?

I don't know who would stop it but .....I feel bad that all these people are being killed there everyday...I would say the United States should do something, BUT we're in everybody's bizness already. Maybe the UN should get some balls and stop it. What you think?

Yes I'm talking about in Dufar, Sudan

Answer 1

It should most definitely be stopped, how could you say otherwise.

Answer 2

Of course the slaughter in Africa (Rwanda, Darfur) should be stopped, but no one is willing to do anything about it. Yes, both are genocide, and I think history will judge us similarly to how Europe was judged during the Holocaust, which is to say, doing nothing.

Answer 3

Uhm....yes. Genocide = bad.

Maybe I missed a headline, but hasn't the genocide ended as of almost ten years ago? I thought the fallout was being addressed in some political and social circles there........and questions about trials for the perpetrators.

Answer 4

Rwandan genocide occured in 1994, maybe you're thinking of the ongoing genocide in Darfur, Sudan. Of course it should be stopped.

To date, approximately 500,000 have been killed and another 2.5 million have been displaced.

Answer 5

the holocaust change into spread over many years and change right into a medical prepared killing Rwanda change into chaotic with 2 sides killing one yet another (quite than one) in an really condensed era of time (a million-3 months)

Answer 6

I think you want say the genocide in Darefour/Soudan. It can be stopped but politicians are not motivated to send troups or doing anything else to stop it.

Answer 7

A noble thought, but who will stop it ?

Answer 8

yes it should be stopped, niether one is acceptable.