what conspiracy theories do you beleive? i dont beleive any of them they are not passible except for flight 93 maybe getting shot down but i dont no
2006-12-02
08:45:48
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
if dont think i feel sorry those people who got burned alive fell 1200 feet and got desinegrated you have to be full of ****. i also think we should stay in Iraq until we kill everyone of those mother *******. iam just asking what one you think are true. If a missle hit the pentagon where did the plane go it didnt just vanis the faa saw it fanish over D.C. the WTC didnt collapse b/c of aur demolitions if so they would of collapsed at the bottom not where they were hit.my dad knew people in the towere sso dont say i dont care who little ****
2006-12-02
09:22:42 ·
update #1
who are right about flight 93 that they were the first soldiers to die in this war
2006-12-02
09:25:05 ·
update #2
There is not a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that I find remotely plausible.
* The gov't shot down United 93. - That claim has been debunked so many times that repeating it only soils the memory of the heroes of the flight.
* The gov't was behind the attacks. - There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start. First, what possible reason would the US gov't have to kill 3000 of its own? Second, Bush is nowhere near smart enough to arrange it. Third, it would require so many agencies of the gov't working together that that alone makes it impossible, much less keeping it secret. Besides, doesn't the fact that Osama admitted to it mean anything to anyone?
* The FDNY was ordered to implode the building. - Okay, the FDNY lost 343 good men and women because they were busy planting explosives with such perfect precision that the building imploded straight down. Does that make sense to anyone?
* The Zionists/Mossad/Israel was behind the attacks. 4000 Jews stayed home from work. - First, this was started by Hezbollah, which, before 9/11, led all terrorist orgs in number of Americans killed. Second, many Jews were among the dead and injured. I guess they missed the email. Third, many Christians and Muslims and others took the day off or were late. Did they get the email instead of the Jews? Or was it that 9/11/01 was primary day in New York State and some people of all religious backgrounds needed to work on campaigns that day.
* Mossad knew about the attacks beforehand. - This is true. Mossad, MI6, the CIA and FBI, and other intelligence agencies worldwide all knew something was going to happen. Unfortunately, no one knew what, when, how, where, or by whom.
2006-12-02 09:17:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For me, the strangest thing that happened during 9/11 was how the plane that hit the Pentagon just completely vanished. Also, the precise hole left in the wall looked more like that created by a missile and not a plane.
2006-12-02 08:55:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Feathery 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
where did flight 77 go then?? I believe that if flight 77 crashed into the pentagon the why won't the government show the tape of the crash to the public? What are they hiding?
2006-12-03 05:20:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zoe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's a lot of sayings about 9/11 some seemed pretty odd like it was already plan and stuff like that I think that we might never know the truth behind such date.
2006-12-02 08:54:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only conspiracy I believe is that Islamofascist savages plotted to kill innocent Americans by hijacking airliners and slamming them into buildings. Anything else is pure hokum. Period, end of story.
2006-12-02 09:58:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am SICK of this question. By talking about these conspiracies you are giving aid & comfort to tne enemy. You show NO regard for those people who died on the air planes& towers.You are giving the terrioust a free ride.Blame those who are guilty, a bunch of religious NUTS who hate us (But love therioust) & want to kill as many of us as they can.
2006-12-02 09:16:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by BUTCH 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well if you want to see a real nut check out Ralph Rene , I dealt with this person as a customer and he ain't right.
2006-12-02 08:54:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're all pretty weak really. Many theories are way too vast and general in scope.
Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’
You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader.
Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.
Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm....... Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.
911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.
Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.
Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.
Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.
Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways. If we can go to war whenver we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?
2006-12-02 15:11:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A lot of them are pure bunk.
2006-12-02 08:53:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
none, seriously how could they fake hundreds of people dyeing? that would be impossible, anyways why would they want to?
2006-12-02 08:53:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lovely 3
·
0⤊
0⤋