Is it true the reason Con's want to protect the unborn is to fill there quota for the military so they can be experiemented for weapon usage and killing others to protect there coward way of selfish life?
2006-12-02 07:28:27 · 13 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They dont really care about abortion. The people who make up the republican party care yes, dont get me wrong. The elected leaders dont care about changing abortion it is just a good topic for a campaign speech and sounds good. If they wanted to outlaw abortion or make it a crime, they would have done it in the last six years.
2006-12-02 07:43:34 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Drill, infant, drill. you may seem at it the way that protection rigidity objectives are seen, i will use this analogy. In global regulation, civilian establishments used for protection rigidity applications can then be seen protection rigidity objectives. at the same time as civilians themselves can under no circumstances be specifically centred, the protection rigidity strategic objective ought to outweigh the prospect to civilian lives. there is not any longer a regulation for the time of conflict that asserts, 0 civilians might want to be killed, their deaths must be minimized with the protection rigidity strategic objective outweighing that probability. So use this including your determination on ANWR section. Does the business, and strategic objective of u . s . a . outweigh the prospect of environmental aspects? Can the environmental aspects be minimized? actual, if internationalists can finish the above conflict regulations between human v. human, then actual u . s . a . can drill oil that can be human v. animal or ecosystem. convinced, please drill and do it now, no longer later. we are sitting on great wallet of oil and we opt to strengthen it, for a multitude of motives that make experience to u . s . a . and something of the West on a international foundation.
2016-11-23 12:58:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So cons are the only ones wanting to protect the unborn? Wow liberals have suprised me again
2006-12-02 07:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
there is no selfish reason for anyone wanting to protect the unborn. one has to get silly like your humorous question to imagine one. on the other hand, there is no reason for wanting to kill them that is not selfish, and there is nothing funny about that.
2006-12-02 08:01:57 · answer #4 · answered by karl k 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They want to protect the unborn so when they wage unjust wars the human kind will have some "extras" left and not get completely wiped out.
2006-12-02 07:35:04 · answer #5 · answered by JS 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I want to protect the unborn because they are the last innocents.
Killing innocence is evil defined.
2006-12-02 07:33:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
you should definitly get a gun permit, and buy a gun, probably a desert eagle. Load it with a bullet, put the gun against your head, then pull the trigger.
2006-12-02 07:33:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no its some queer reason about thinking that all life and potential therefore is sacred,
who would have ever thought, huh?
2006-12-02 07:30:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
"Straw man" argument. Go get an education moron! This is NOT true at all.
2006-12-02 07:35:55 · answer #9 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What an intelligent question!
2006-12-02 07:29:54 · answer #10 · answered by John16 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋