Looks like you're going to be in Sonoma County. Much of the attraction of the area is outdoorsy activities and rural charm, so the towns are really just conduits to get to the rivers, woods, and farms...rather than places to go in and of themselves.
http://www.sonomacounty.com/default.aspx
http://www.sonoma.com/
Petaluma itself is a small town. And it's pretty nice there.
http://cityofpetaluma.net/
Santa Rosa is the largest town in the area (population 150,000). It doesn't really have much of a nightlife because everyone goes to the City, but there is some performance arts, a couple of bars, a Wednesday night market, and a symphony.
http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/default.aspx?PageId=18
If you're gay, the tiny towns of Guernville and Sebastopol might be of interest to you (it's Northern California's P-Town or Fire Island).
http://www.ci.sebastopol.ca.us/
http://www.guerneville-online.com/.
Sonoma State University is in Rohnert Park. It's a very low key and pleasant campus. But there isn't much to do.
http://www.ci.rohnert-park.ca.us/
2006-12-02 07:12:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by SFdude 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Petaluma is an expensive place to live. My suggestion is to live in town if you can. You wil spend much less time commuting. When you are looking for nightlife, you can drive 40 miles to San Francisco, if necessary.
Petaluma does have a few decent bars and lounges. The Mystic theater can be found in Downtown Petaluma, in the new theater district next to McNear's restaurant and bar. Many up and coming bands play at the Mystic.
Petaluma is also about 25 miles from the coast and about the same distance to Sonoma.
2006-12-02 08:36:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by OneHump 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, living in Napa is a bit more expensive, but if the company's reimbursing you... Not a bad commute, a lot of people do it, or even longer commutes taking over 2 hours one way! Napa has a lot of cultural stuff, great food and restaurants, shopping, and it's beautiful and easy to get around in the city.
Sonoma is growing. It's not a bad city either, but same thing, the rents are going up. But it's a pretty city with a town square and some great food shops, and their wines are gaining in popularity.
Both Napa and Sonoma are relatively safe places to live. I've never had a problem here. But whatever you do, do NOT live in Vallejo unless you want to get mugged, shot, or DIE.
2006-12-02 06:19:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by chefgrille 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer Rohnert Park or Santa Rosa to Petaluma. Napa is nice, but a bit snooty.
2006-12-02 06:41:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It rather relies upon what your interest is and the place you reside. If issues have been so terrible interior the united kingdom I in all probability does not bump into this style of superb style of individuals residing right here. united states of america is a extensive united states, you will discover this style of superb style of diverse variables, commencing with the components. in case you seek for a uk like climate, head for Seattle. in terms of interest, employment and dealing way of life, London is the situation I see the main comparable because of the fact the U. S.. The artwork ethics of individuals in many instances is composed of fewer holiday journeys and intensely lengthy working hours, alongside with interior the weekend (like doing a great number of information at homestead etc.). i might say increasing on your profession is in all probability simpler interior the U. S. besides the fact that if opposition is everywhere fierce. besides the fact that mutually as you would be able to upward push greater immediately interior the U. S., you additionally can fall very immediately. There are infinite examples of persons who had each thing and lost each thing, ending up snoozing on the line. the greater severe is thoughts of persons who get sick, could end artwork, get fired, receive no earnings and lose each thing. Or people who can not cope with to pay for well being care. interior the united kingdom even once you're slightly worse off this style of dramatic fall won't ensue. As for standards of residing, back it rather is annoying to evaluate. individuals in all probability stay in greater desirable properties, greater desirable it rather is greater fee-effective than interior the united kingdom, ordinary products alongside with clothing and nutrition may be greater fee-effective yet you pays for this style of superb style of insurances on good that it evens out. additionally American residences are as my mum says 'made from cardboard', they take little or no time to construct and are greater fragile. i recognize human beings interior the united kingdom who've an exceedingly severe high quality way of life, in all probability plenty greater desirable than a great number of individuals so i ought to be biased. I even have an American buddy who plenty greater desirable life interior the united kingdom, yet another one million/2 American individual who went back to stay there together with her American discern yet they could not stay greater desirable than a 300 and sixty 5 days. think of British severe colleges are undesirable? You ain't see not something in comparison to the U. S.!
2016-12-18 06:21:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by nella 3
·
0⤊
0⤋