2006-12-02 05:23:33 · 9 answers · asked by reza 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
They both have advantages...Personally I think Science is because it gives us so much more. You can't really buy knowledge...
2006-12-02 05:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by Missy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money is not better,but without money there is no science;)
2006-12-02 13:32:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science clearly. Science from scientia, having knowledge. You can live without money - man did so for a long time. You can't live for long without knowing which berries make you sick and dead and which berries give you energy so you can live long enough to figure out some means to catch a bird or rabbit.
2006-12-02 14:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money is a kind of a "facilitator" as things cost money;
Science is a "tool" which one can use or abuse according
to one's prerogative/motives.
Is science or money better? You be the judge.
2006-12-02 13:32:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
science: not even close!
Science is knowledge. Money is wealth.
With enough science, there is no end to wealth and power.
2006-12-02 17:52:07 · answer #5 · answered by eagleperch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would you compare science with money in the first place?
you cant buy science, it's FACT... money, ILLUSION.
2006-12-02 13:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by simplyJESSE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I had science and no money, they I would die.
If I had money and no science, then I would live in ignorant bliss.
2006-12-02 13:57:36 · answer #7 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can't eat, you can't study science. If you can't buy food, you can't eat. If you have no money, you can't buy food. so...logically...money. But science is important, too...
2006-12-02 13:53:54 · answer #8 · answered by bdbarry09 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? How can these be compared? It's like asking "Should I drive a tree or desk?"
2006-12-02 13:45:31 · answer #9 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋