English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It does to me, because most of you don't know most of the TNA wrestlers names! Hell, most of you who were so quick to answer the Ron Killings question admitted to not even knowing who Ron Killing is! If you want to know, Ron Killings used to be called K-Quick when he was in the WWE and is an advandced version of how Booker T wrestles. I am a WWE fan and have been since 1992 when I became a diehard fan of the Icon Bret "The Hitman" Hart, but I, like most fans who have watched wrestling for a long time, respect what TNA is doing because they focus more on wrestling than just trying to find ways to entertain the crowd like the WWE does, and with wrestlers like Roidtista as a champion the WWE's credibility is going way down. So I don't mind this little war TNA is waging on WWE. Who knows, maybe once Vince sees how big of a threat TNA is he will get his damn ego in check and get back to giving the fans the best damn show he and the WWE possibly can!

2006-12-02 05:00:02 · 12 answers · asked by Thomas C 4 in Sports Wrestling

Also, I believe this TNA threat is good for the WWE, because they do their best stuff when they are under pressure from competition, hence the "Attitude Era." So I implore all of you to actually watch TNA and give it a chance, because they do have great wrestlers that many of you probably never heard of, like AJ Styles, Christopher Daniels, and Samoa Joe. What do you think?

2006-12-02 05:03:31 · update #1

The viewing may have been a little boring at first, but that is why they hired Vince Russo, who was really the brains and the creator of the "Attitude Era," because he was head writer at that point in time and Vince gave him almost complete control of writing during his time there until he quit after a disagreement with Vince. So, if anybody can make TNA better it's Vince Russo.

2006-12-02 05:15:15 · update #2

12 answers

I have been watching wrestling for 20 years and I have seen the ups and downs in wrestling. WWE today is def more about sports entertainment these days than it is about wrestling. Example: Survivor Series was 3 hours but only 45 min. of that was wrestling. Those numbers don't add up to me. I do enjoy that TNA has more of a focus on wrestling and not on the drama. And I do believe that TNA can pose a threat to the WWE. But they have a long way to go. Right now, the only "5-star" wrestlers that TNA has, in my opinion, is Kurt Angle, Sting, Samoa Joe, and maybe Jarrett. If any wrestlers from TNA jumped ships, these are the only ones that I think could really be main eventers.

I hate how some fans think that TNA is the greatest thing ever though by saying they have all the best wrestlers like Voodoo Kin Mafia, Christian, Rhyno, Daniels, Styles, Killings, etc. All these wrestlers are good, but none of them could be a main eventer in WWE accept MAYBE Styles. The fact of the matter is the WWE has more tallent than TNA but they just don't use it so much. To me TNA has the potential to be the next WCW only because they offer a different style of wrestling than WWE does just like WCW did.

2006-12-02 05:50:38 · answer #1 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 1 0

I watched it occasionally on Thursday night and X divison sucks.LAX Hernandez looks like a steroid freak.The X division is overrated except for Styles.Senshi looks stupid.Jarret is overated.Abyss can't wrestle and somehow champion because title can change hands on DQ is retarded.
LAX wants to burn American Flag.Rhino sucks.Raven is wash up along with Team 3 D.

Only TNA (never worked in WWE)wrestlers worthy if being in WWE:
1.AJ Styles
2. American Most Wanted
3. Christoper Daniels
4. The Naturals
5.Chris Sabin
6. Sting
7. Somoan Joe
8.Petey Williams

2006-12-02 23:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think that the only reason there are TNA haters is because some TNA fans dis WWE. A good example of this is TNA fans saying that DX sucks just cos of VKM. You cannot compare legends like HHH and HBK to losers like Billy Gunn and Road Dogg. I'm not a TNA hater but I definitely think that WWE is more entertaining in terms of wrestling, wrestlers, promos and everything else than TNA. No offence but the TNA promos are poor.

2006-12-02 05:21:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I watched TNA but I prefer WWE.TNA's speciality matches are quite bizarre,for example:The Fans' Revenge Match is quite bizarre and those "fans" are actually TNA's staff.So far the best speciality match that TNA has,is the Ultimate X,but it's not as nice as the Hell In A Cell or Elimination Chamber.TNA is too small to start a war right now,they should have wait for a few more years,but we all know it's just a publicity stunt.TNA is quite boring,but it won't put me to sleep.If WWE is going to do something nice,you can bet your azz,it's going to be nice.

2006-12-03 01:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 0 1

I have watched TNA and they are boring. WWE is so much better, I have tried to get into TNA but all they do is bring in has bees, never has beens, and wash ups from the WWE. For example Rhino he sucked in the WWE and is good in TNA. Rhino is not that good of a wrestler. The only person I want back is Christian, he had talent but WWE never exploited it. They have horrible story lines that go on for a month then they go nowhere. Batista could take any of your gay TNA wrestlers including fat@ss Samoa Joe. I see WWE putting them bankrupt soon if they want to really get into the same ring as WWE. And they took OVW's announcer or whatever he was and now is he their GM. LOL, he is so annoying and sucks at what he does. TNA is not a threat to WWE at all.

2006-12-02 05:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by Traffic 4 · 0 2

I watch tna as much as I can and I'm a big wwe fan.But It makes me fall asleep.I know a lot of tna wrestlers names (Ron Killings,Sting,AJ Styles,Kurt Angle,J lethal,Christian, Abyss,Chris Sabin,etc.).I think wwe has fallin off the horse but they Will get back on soon.tna isn't a big threat to wwe.

2006-12-02 05:09:10 · answer #6 · answered by The wwe diva of 2010 3 · 3 0

i agree. i watch both but prefer tna. i watch wwe but fast forward a lot (i tape it) because there is a lot of crap but i watch all of tna. the people who hate on tna or say its boring dont like wrestling, just soaps with blood. i prefer the wrestling to tell the storyline rather than talking and pyro.

2006-12-02 06:09:22 · answer #7 · answered by mdevil3 2 · 2 0

they have not,and those who watch know nothing about wretling so they go along with what the ones who don't watch say.

2006-12-02 06:02:20 · answer #8 · answered by steeler nation!!!!!!! 3 · 1 0

i have seen it and they take the wwe wrestlers and put dumb names like christian cage and team 3-D and they should go bankrupt any time

2006-12-02 05:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by MAF1113 6 · 1 2

I totally agree with you

2006-12-02 07:59:48 · answer #10 · answered by HHH 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers