2006-12-02 04:56:29 · 9 answers · asked by Daniel R 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Habeas corpus is not applicable in a time of war nor does it directly apply to prisoners of war...
2006-12-02 05:27:58 · update #1
No, because liberals wouldnt participate in a conspiracy like that, also, they arent making billions of dollars along with their friends from investments in oil companies. Why don't you grow up and accept the fact that the people of the us don't like the course of the current admistration and they are looking for a change? Get over it already! You lost the house!!! Crawl back under your rock!
2006-12-02 05:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
YES we can but first lets see how long it takes for them to get the troops home like they all promised to do to get elected this year first. I personally blame the attacks we had during the current presidents terms on the former Liberal presidents lack of doing his job and yet nobody said anything when we knew where the terrorists were and he was playing in the office with a fat ugly intern
2 presidents impeached both Democrat Hmmm I wonder why
2006-12-04 11:04:51 · answer #2 · answered by topgunpilot22 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, we blame the attack on the terrorists.
Depends on how long that attack takes. The next day, most likely not. Depends on if the terrorists think they'll get away with it or not. Like 9/11, Bush was only President for 9 months. This attack was planned for years, and based on the actions of Clinton toward terrorism. I'm sure Al-Qeada thought they'd get a free pass from Bush too.
If it's 3 years into a liberal president's term, and he/she seems soft, then yes, you can blame it on him/her. If it's 3 weeks into the presidency, not really.
2006-12-02 13:01:40 · answer #3 · answered by theodore r 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I wasn't aware that we blamed the last attack on a president. Another attack is bound to take place during any term of office. There will be a lot of blame to pass around & I'm sure that whoever is president will get his/her share of it.
2006-12-04 00:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by Judith 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, first off your assuming that there would definately be an attack sometime between '08-'12 which explains the fearful mindset exported by Republican leaders and imported by their base.
In addition, it wouldn't be "their" president it would also be your president. Just like Bush is my president even though I feel he'd be better suited as a crossing guard.
All this baseless fear exhibited by the right is what has allowed our rights to be severely eroded over the past five years (Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, Military Commissions Act, Habeus Corpus). Do you even know what Habeus Corpus means? Most of my conservative friends don't.
Get educated simpleton.
2006-12-02 13:10:33 · answer #5 · answered by Kenneth W 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You can blame it on who you want, whether or not that is true is another thing. However, to be consistent you would need to blame it on Bush since you are blaming everything on Clinton now.
2006-12-02 13:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by clueless_nerd 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Political parties are merely an illusion, because THIS secret and evil group has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-12-04 09:56:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You seem to want that.
2006-12-02 13:09:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sure. Why not.
2006-12-02 20:58:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋