2006-12-02 04:00:58 · 20 answers · asked by maria b 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
it doesnt make a difference, as to feeling,, except to him, sometimes uncircumsized can cause irritation,,,,,,, there is the thought that also, with uncircumsized, bacteria can collect in the folds, and be passed to the woman
2006-12-02 04:03:43 · answer #1 · answered by dlin333 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, there is a lack of sensitivity in the head of th penis for circumcized men. This can reult in slightly less pleasurable oral sex, masturbation, and possibly intercourse. Men who are circumcized generally don't last any longer in the sack (so I've heard) then man who aren't, but men who are need to go faster (more friction), which can be a bit of a turn off to some women.
Oh, and as long as the man bathes regularly, there is no evidence to suggest there is any higher chance for infection or STD spread. This is a risk in people who do not bathe regularly (ie, people in third world countries)
2006-12-02 04:03:57 · answer #2 · answered by UnceasingFaun 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I've been with both and had not noticed a difference during sex. I have no preference (of course now I prefer my husband's) but the uncircumcised was a little "creepy" looking a first and took some getting used to.
2006-12-02 04:04:47 · answer #3 · answered by Kimberly H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To the woman perhaps there is no difference. But I remember reading something regarding the difference in pleasure between uncircumsised and circumsised males. Apparently there are "pleasure receptors" in the foreskin that increase the arousal during intercourse.
So for all you uncircusised male's out there, all I gotta say is "YOU LUCKY BASTARDS!" lol you get slight more pleasure.
2006-12-02 04:07:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The skin that is removed is full of nerve endings, so a man is bound to loose some feeling. As a circumcised man I can tell you it still feels very good.
2006-12-02 04:24:18 · answer #5 · answered by Jim C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In general there are those who prefer that some guys are and then there are those it doesn't really matter......
And personally for me it don't make a difference because they didn't have the choice in the matter when they were born and their parents decide too and some jus against it because to do that now will be a lot of pain.....
Jus accept him as he is......
2006-12-02 04:11:10 · answer #6 · answered by tutsie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My ex was not circumcised and it didn't make a difference in the sex. From time to time..the foreskin may have gotten pulled back to far and it hurt him...but didn't really make a difference with the sex.
2006-12-02 08:22:36 · answer #7 · answered by Lori 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no it does not make a difference ........... for some man to be circumcised it's by religion and for some it's because they have problems with the foreskin. And other man are not circumcised . I have not noticed any difference ,i had both
2006-12-02 04:04:36 · answer #8 · answered by silverearth1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think there wouold be a difference. Because when an uncircumsized male gets and ewrection the skin stays back I would think. I dont know I am not a turtle dove!
2006-12-02 04:04:29 · answer #9 · answered by unclewewill 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
My husband was never circumcised and I can't tell the difference. If anything it is better.
2006-12-02 04:04:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anna A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋