Shouldnt we show them what we are really capable of the next time theses bast**ds take liberties in our home lands???? Im from the U.K and am really nervous about Dickh**ds like Iran And Pakistan who have both got nuclear capabilities.
2006-12-02 01:56:30 · 22 answers · asked by thomasmolyneux 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Listen to these morons who think they know what they are talking about. The world seems to think diplomacy, diplomacy, diplomacy.
But how well does diplomacy work when a country feels it is destined to wipe out all people who do not follow there religion. Mark my words when I say we will go to war with Iran. And if we need to use our nukes before they use theirs, we will. We will turn the middle east into glass if need be.
But I would say more likely than not we will use tremendous bombing campaign against any one who posses a threat on military targets, that have nuclear weapons.
It will be done by my USA and your UK along side Israel. After that there will be very small fire fights against terrorists in thousands if not millions of places around the world.
This will be a big problem, but it will be a huge, problem if N. Korea, Russia and China start military action at the same time.
People love to ramble on that war solves nothing. But in reality war solves everything. But it should only be used if diplomacy wouldn’t work in its place. This is a situation were diplomacy is working again us.
As they (Iran) tells use they want to help Iraq, they give terrorists training and weapons, then send them into Iraq to corrupt the Iraqi gov. As Hezbollah says if we knew Israel was going to strike use for kidnaping their own, we wouldn’t have done it, they continue to send rockets into Israeli territory.
But unfortunately I think after Iraq turned out to be a disaster, the UK and the USA will not attack until one of us are attacked again. I think the next attack will be a large one.
2006-12-02 10:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by BAD KARMA 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iran and akistan are yet to cause anyone any grief and i have a slight suspicion that they never intend to. If the USA are aloud to have hundreds of nuclear war heads, then so are they. Also, sending missiles over to them will be stooping to their level. They kill US citizens, US kill theirs... who's worse? They're both aggressors. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if the US army are officially labelled as terrorists after their reaction to the Iraqi leadership and the horrible events of 9/11. USA is a country i love, but they are terrorists and no better (if not worse) than al qaeda and the taliban. Don't fear for us, fear for the citizens of the three leading terrorist groups of the world: USA, Al Qaeda and The Taliban... and pray that the UK stay out of it next time any of these group decide to kill citizens because of what THEY believe in...
2006-12-02 02:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Aramiak 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Erm, you seem to be mistaken on a couple of things, no offense meant.
Iran doesn't have nuclear capabilities yet.
Parvez Musharraf is Pakistan's leader and he is one of George Bush's strongest allies in the war on terror, even going so far as to bomb Pakistanis in madrasa (religious school) on suspician of terrorism/extremism.
So far, neither current Iranian nor Pakistani authorities have committed any terrorism outside their own countries. They shouldn't really be your concern.
Also, I don't think Pakistan could even fire nukes to the UK. I could understand Indians being slightly concerned but not you.
So have good sleep tonight! ;-)
2006-12-02 10:55:30 · answer #3 · answered by ACKIE00 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the countries supporting terrorists are so small that we wouldn't need nuclear arms, just conventional. Why contaminate the atmosphere just to exterminate a few vermin? If you saw the opening salvo of the Iraq war, not one nuke was used and it was wonderfully effective.
2006-12-02 02:02:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would hate to go nuclear, but I do think we could give them a good warning. You attack our people again, and Medina will disappear, a second attack and Mecca is gone, a third attack and the Dome of the Rock will now be called Hole in the Rock.
2006-12-02 02:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What will be your target?
To use nuclear weapons against, e.g. Tehran or Islamabad would kill millions, pollute the earth, etc when the real targets, who will number quite a lot less, will still be in your country, maybe even next door.
OK, let's bomb your street!!!
2006-12-02 02:07:25 · answer #6 · answered by efes_haze 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Which country exactly do you want to strike? Do you know where the terrorists are? So if there's a cell in Florida you want to nuke 'em. Oh yeah. Great Idea. Like that'll stop it all.
2006-12-02 02:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by Smurfetta 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One makes the world worse with this fear of terrorist attacks and inequality of homan beings and life around the world. If we all behaved dicent to each other we would not have terrorists, we would not have fears, we would have just love and peace
2006-12-04 00:14:23 · answer #8 · answered by Justine T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who are you going to bomb?...They don't know where Bin Laden is...are you going to wipe out a city? ...How many innocent people do you want to kill?
Do you want to start WW3?
PS If we had followed that 'logic' - then Northern Ireland would currently resemble post war Hiroshima.
2006-12-02 02:04:04 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Crusty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It might be OK if they came from the nation of Terrosamia but it's not like that is it? You'd just end up killing millions of innocents.
2006-12-02 02:08:06 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋