English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was the liberation of women in the US an asset or liability for the US and beyond?

How will these continuing changes effect human reproduction and society?

Can this event be seen in other animal species?

2006-12-02 01:55:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

11 answers

Why do you think there are so many queers now days?

2006-12-02 01:56:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Every animal species has its own pattern. Some bite the males head off in copulation. Lets leave them to it shall we.

For women liberation was an asset. they earned more, they had more control over their lives, they infiltrated the universities and learned more. Their lives became more forfilling and they stopped taking all that asprin in desperation.

For men it might well not have been an asset. The loss of cheap exploitable labour in the workforce, unpaid domestic help in the home, a ready force of desperate women needing money and not having the means to earn it must have been a great attraction for some . Hell, she wasn't even king of her castle - he was!

Now they are taking your jobs man! They are better at them than you are man! You better oppress 'em again and get 'em back in that box, barefoot and pregnant again.

Oh heck. There is that there pill nowadays isn't there.
Damnit.

2006-12-02 10:26:35 · answer #2 · answered by AJ... Australia 4 · 1 1

There is definitely some kind of gender war going on under the radar. As in all wars, there will be many casualties. Some wars have clear-cut victors. Others don't. I don't see this one having an ultimate victor unless either the female or the male of the species discovers the secret of reproduction independent of the opposite gender. That is not as unlikely an outcome as you might expect however.

2006-12-02 10:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by Seeker 4 · 2 0

Feminism embraces the gay culture and as a result demasculinzes the masculine male. To feminism only a neutered male is acceptable. I am all for women having the right to get payed for the work she does equal work equal pay. I have three daughters and no one better tell me thay can not do anything that a man can do. By the same token I am against feminist because they harass women into thinking that abortion is the only answer in an inconvienent pregnancy. That men should be more feminnine and the only real man is one that has no balls to speak for himself. Feminist will deny this but look at thier actions and judge for yourself. They protest if science brings into the light any real physical difference between the brains of a man and a woman. God designed women to nurture and care for thier children. I love my children and I nurture them with all my being and yet I am still not able to be thier mother. I wasn't designed that way thier mother can not be thier father. It takes two of us. A fathers role is to push his child to help his child to stretch and grow, you see this on the playground with the father of a young girl or boy and the father is urging them to try the monkey bars or swing higher. The mother will be there fullfilling her role as protecter of her children saying to the same child "Not so high, be careful. Please don't climb that high. " Why this difference. Because children need to know someone cares for thier safety but they also need to be urged to try. People have to realize this is the role of a family. two women raising a child will realize that thier child needs strong male role models to have healthy relationships and will usually seek this out. Males likewise should realize this and seek out female rolemodles for thier child. Anyone raiseing a child on thier own realizes this as well and will seek out the gender of the rolemodel their childs needs.

Marriage is still prevalant but devorce is rampant and that is mostly due to feminism. Feminst try to charge that marriage only hurts the woman and it is easy to point out the failings of a man because feminist for the most part are women. They see the role of the woman involved in a traditional female role as an anthema. They easily convince a woman in such a role that she is unfullfilled and that she needs to leave her husband and children and get a career so that she can find fullfillment, Many women after achieveing their goal of a career realize too late that they miss the comfort of a companion and the stability of a family. There is in this country a growing segment of women that reject feminist ideals and choose to stay at home and raise thier children. Femnist hate this because it trivializes thier cause. Watch how a career woman feminist reacts to someone who says she is a mother and a housewife. She will scoff and turn her back imediately as this is someone she thinks of as stupid and uninteresting.
Feminsit have ruined marriage in this country and they need to realize this and go away.
They wont though because they are doing Satans work breeding disharmony in the family structure and destroying good morals.
Just my opinion and worth what you paid for it.

2006-12-02 10:30:02 · answer #4 · answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6 · 0 2

A liability. If you have noticed, more and more men are refusing to marry. More men whether by choice or force have much less to do with their kids (as do women who have custody because they want to only consider themselves). the family worked better in the past becuase kids were healthier and better adjusted. Men and women knew their roles and both together worked for the betterment of fmaily. Now it is everyone for themselves. The problems that we face in society today will not get better, only worse.

2006-12-02 09:58:36 · answer #5 · answered by James 4 · 2 2

It's an asset - it shows how much more progressive the Western world is from ignornat and backward nations that try and control and limit women, even their very appearence. It is true that intelligent people breed less that third world nations, but this has less to do with women's rights and more to do with access to birth control

2006-12-02 10:01:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

i don't see where it makes a difference one way or another. some women have always been controlling either behind the scene's like it used to be before the feminists, or out in the open like it is now. I'd rather it be up front so i know who I'm dealing with

2006-12-02 10:04:01 · answer #7 · answered by Ron N 5 · 2 1

Given that we have seen a reactionary seizure of power in the U.S. over the last six years your question seems more like a hypothesis that can only generate irrelevant answers since your suppositions have nothing to do with reality.

2006-12-02 10:05:39 · answer #8 · answered by colefinch 2 · 2 2

1. Humans aren't animals... they are human... so who cares if it can be seen in other animal species

2. As a result of the reduction of the matriarch in the US, If you're a white male your basically screwed... white men are the most discriminated against group in the country but of course they can't say anything about it or else the communist groups like the feminists, the NAACP, and the ACLU will whine and complain and cry prejudice and get their way furthering the discrimination of the white male.

2006-12-02 09:59:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Hopefully the children brought forth will be able to read a forum heading and post their question appropriately. The Patriarchal society has apparently failed.

2006-12-02 10:02:37 · answer #10 · answered by tjnstlouismo 7 · 1 2

Contrary to your beliefs, the US still has a largely Patriarchal base.
The womens liberation movement has had nothing but a positive effect.

2006-12-02 10:00:12 · answer #11 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers