infowars.com
2006-12-02 01:50:47 · 17 answers · asked by pnatt89 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yeah, that's a given.
2006-12-02 01:58:04 · answer #1 · answered by swissmiss620 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Could be. I doubt anyone knows for sure. But I did like the controversial footage that floated around the net of what some say looked like the last second of a rocket slamming into the Pentagon.
I watched his stuff for a while. I've researched other interesting arguments and considerations, and from what I see on just day to day reality and watching people, reading the newspaper and staying generally informed, I would have to say the police state is here.
2006-12-02 02:25:25 · answer #2 · answered by mystik_rhythms 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know Alex Jones, but I don't believe the official story, what were all those supplemental explosions in the wtc, and how does a commercial airliner make only a 16 foot hole in the pentagon. Have you been on an airplane, they are huge.
2006-12-02 01:58:42 · answer #3 · answered by j. a. prufrock 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably but we will never know all the facts about 9-11 just like J.F.K. and the Warren commission report did not tell us every thing either
2006-12-02 02:37:10 · answer #4 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another conspiracy theory.If it really was an inside job someone would have leaked evidence because no one in Washington can keep a secret.
2006-12-02 02:01:09 · answer #5 · answered by Grubster 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-12-02 01:52:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Alex Jones, whozat? Conspiracy theories are fun- but nah.
2006-12-02 01:52:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No... Alex Jones is saying he is a complete moron and an idiot, and he also saying you all are total jerks to believe him.
2006-12-02 02:00:10 · answer #8 · answered by Dragonlord Warlock 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get me a little solid proof and I'll believe it. Otherwise it's not going to hold up and be taken seriously.
2006-12-02 01:58:02 · answer #9 · answered by John P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he hardly makes counter argument if someone point out obvious flaw in his 'theories' other than attack others.
Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’
You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader.
Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.
Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.
911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.
Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.
Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.
Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.
Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways. If we can go to war whenver we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?
2006-12-03 22:28:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋